pre Adamite race

fore beginning a discussion of Ham, or his son Kush (or Cush), it is quite important to acquire an understanding of the word “Ethiopian,” as the Greeks called the Kushites, as the word is often translated in our Bibles and as we call the people inhabiting the land of Kush in Africa today. Our “Ethiopian” comes form the Greek word ΑίθίΨ which properly means “shining face,” “glowing face” or sunburnt face,” AND WAS CERTAINLY NOT USED BY THE EARLIEST GREEK WRITERS TO DESCRIBE THE DARK RACES. There are several words used to describe “black,” “swart,” “dark,” etc., in Greek which are applied to people. Among them are (here are several Greek words that I don’t have the knowledge to put the proper Greek letters here so will just leave them out). There are other words meaning “dark,” but seemingly not applies to people.

Words related to “fiery burning...of metal, flashing, glittering...” ; “to light up, kindle...;” “clear sky, fair weather;” the closest, “fiery-looking, of metal, flashing; of wine, sparkling,” but according to Liddle & Scott, someone recorded in the Greek Anthologies, a late and wide collection of Greek inscriptions mostly from well into the first millennium A.D., either translated or used as “swart, dark.” However this is clearly contrary to the true spirit of the word’s meaning. Applied to Kush, a White man, or bright red or brassy-colored, which is something which happens only to Caucasians in the outdoors and is exactly what one may expect Kushites in Ethiopia to look like.

Moses fled Egypt the land of Ham (Psalm 105:23; 105:27; 106:22), as recorded in Exodus chapter 2, and met with the Midianites, descendants of Abraham and Keturah (Genesis 25:1-2) from whom he took a wife. These Midianites lived in the land of Kush, as an be discerned from Numbers chapter 12. Abraham had sent his sons with Keturah “east-ward unto the east country” (Genesis 25:6), and surely this “east country” is that called Kush in Genesis 2:13, beyond Mesopotamia, to where we have the Hindu-Kush mountains today. Or at least somewhere between the Euphrates and that country, as we will soon see from the Greek writers. Moses did not go to Ethiopia in Africa for his wife, and there are no Midianites ever spoken of here.

In Hesiod’s “Theogony,” probably written in the 8th century B.C., Memnon, legendary king of the Ethiopians, was the son of Eos, or “Light.” In the “Aethiopis” by Arctinus of Miletus, written as a sequel to Homer’s Ilad, Memnon the Ethiopian aided the Trojans in the war against the Greeks, only to be slain by Achilles. Herodotus (3:94) mentions the “Ethiopians of Asia,” and although he also describes black and wooly-haired Ethiopians (3:101; 7:70), we will refer to Diodorus Siculus for a more complete picture below. Herodotus calls Susa, the famed capital city (along with Persepolis and also the Median city Ecbatana) of the Persian Empire, the “city of Memnon” (5:53-54), since the Greeks believed that Memnon founded that city.

Diodorus Siculus, relating the tradition concerning Memnon, has Ethiopia in Asia sending aid to the Trojans, including Assyrians and “men of Susiana.” (2:22:1-5; 4:75:4) So the Greeks have many witnesses of an Ethiopia in Asia, in lands and cities known to be inhabited by Caucasians, and with people taking part in some of the first events recorded by the Caucasians of Europe. Thus, the Hebrews have a Kush in a land which may be supposed to be the same as the Greek, if not close, yet the Hebrew record is not much earlier than the events the Greeks were recording. As a third witness, we have a Kush on our own modern maps not much further east than where we may assume that the ancient district was situated. This surely can not be coincidental, especially considering the reference in Genesis 2:13, mentioned previously.

Now to turn to the Kush, or Ethiopia, of Africa. In the first eleven chapters of his third book, Diodorus draws from earlier historians (as he always did) to describe the various peoples of African, Ethiopia and the various tribes contrast with one another quite starkly. The first “Ethiopians” he discusses are endowed with what we may consider a well-developed form of “western civilization,” for he states “they say that they were the first to be taught to honor the gods and to hold sacrifices and processions and festivals.”

They quote Homer in reference to themselves (Iliad 1:423-24), they recount the unsuccessful invasions into their country by Cambyses and Semiramis, and they claim that the Egyptians were originally Ethiopian colonists, led by Osiris. The two types of their writing (like Egypt) popular (demotic) and sacred (hieroglyphic), are described, and it is said that the sacred is common among these Ethiopians.

Their priests were much like the Egyptian. They believed that their kings gained sovereignty by Divine Providence, their laws and punishments were from custom, and they practiced the same flight of refuge which the Greeks did, which was similar to the Hebrew Levitical cities of refuge. An Ethiopian king under Ptolemy was educated in Greece and studied Philosophy, and aside from a few odd customs there is no reason to believe that these Ethiopians, whose physical characteristics were not mentioned, were anything but civilized, and not much different than the rest of “western” society.

Now we know that Ham was a White Man as the son of Noah, and therefore that in the beginning Egypt consisted of White Men; also had white men as their rulers for many centuries known as the shepherd kings.

Psalm 105:23

23: ISRAEL ALSO CAME INTO EGYPT; AND JACOB SOJOURNED IN THE LAND OF HAM.

Psalm 105:27

27: They shewed his signs among them, AND WONDERS IN THE LAND OF HAM.

Psalm 106:22

22: Wondrous works IN THE LAND OF HAM, and terrible things by the Red sea.

In stark contrast to those Ethiopians first discussed, starting at 3:8:1, Diodorus says:

“But there are also a great many other tribes of the Ethiopians, (here it is made apparent that, like ‘Phoenicia’ and other labels, ‘Ethiopia’ has become only a geographic designation), some of them dwelling in the land lying on both banks of the Nile and on the islands in the river, others inhabiting the neighboring country of Arabia (between the Nile and the Red Sea; the land of Ham, and others residing in the interior of Libya (the rest of Africa; and Sudan here). The majority of them, and especially those who dwell along the river, are black in color and have flat noses and wooly hair.”

Here it is evident that Diodorus is describing the Nubians and other wandering black tribes of the region. He continues:

“As for their spirit they are entirely savage and display the nature of a wild beast...and are as far removed as possible from human kindness to one another...and cultivating none of the practices of civilized life...they present a striking contrast when considered in the light of our own customs.”

So surely it seems here that if we do not have a White culture in Ethiopia in an era not long before Diodorus’ own, we certainly have at least a remnant of one. Ezekiel 30 lists Ethiopia among “all the mingled people,”

Jeremiah 25:20‑26

20: And all the MINGLED PEOPLE, and all the kings of the land of Uz, and all the kings of the land of the Philistines, and Ashkelon, and Azzah, and Ekron, and the remnant of Ashdod,

21: Edom, and Moab, and the children of Ammon,

22: And all the kings of Tyrus, and all the kings of Zidon, and the kings of the isles which are beyond the sea,

23: Dedan, and Tema, and Buz, and all that are in the utmost corners,

24: And all the kings of Arabia, AND ALL THE KINGS OF THE MINGLED PEOPLE that dwell in the desert,

25: And all the kings of Zimri, and all the kings of Elam, and all the kings of the Medes,

26: And all the kings of the north, far and near, one with another, and all the kingdoms of the world, which are upon the face of the earth: and the king of Sheshach shall drink after them.

Jeremiah 50:37‑39

37: A sword is upon their horses, and upon their chariots, AND UPON ALL THE MINGLED PEOPLE that are in the midst of her; and they shall become as women: a sword is upon her treasures; and they shall be robbed.

38: A drought is upon her waters; and they shall be dried up: for it is the land of graven images, and they are mad upon their idols.

39: Therefore the wild beasts of the desert with the wild beasts of the islands shall dwell there, and the owls shall dwell therein: and it shall be no more inhabited for ever; neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation.

Ezekiel 30:5

5: Ethiopia, and Libya, and Lydia, AND ALL THE MINGLED PEOPLE, and Chub, and the men of the land that is in league, shall fall with them by the sword.

To briefly revisit the Asian portion of Kush, in his book The Lost Tribes, pp. 148-150, Dr. Moore proposes that the word “Kush” may be the underlying root of “Khazar” and “Cossack” (Kush, Kosa, etc.), and hence the ancestors of those people which later became prominent, and among those set to fulfill the destiny set for them in Ezekiel 38 and other prophecies are very likely revealed.

Surely Mitsrayim, or Mizraim, is Egypt. Where the Old Testament reads “Egypt,” in all places the Hebrew reads “Mitsrayim.” The term “Egypt” is that used throughout Greek literature, “Aegyptus.” Mitsrayim was not Egypt as we know it, but only a much smaller district along both banks of the Nile. The early Greeks seem to have written little about Egypt outside of Thebes and Heliopolis, although we sill have reading to do in that period so can’t comment fully on the matter.

This is much to be said about early Egypt that is beyond the scope of this discussion, but warrants at least a mention. First, early Egypt actually consisted of several alien cultures adverse to one another and eventually amalgamated, which was surely not a good idea. The pharaonic civilization in Egypt appeared rather suddenly, not long after 3000 B.C., consistent with Septuagint chronology. There were actually two groups in early Egypt, centuries apart, remembered as “Hyksos.” The first group little is known about, a noble Adamic race, probably Shemites and maybe even Hebrew, who built the Great Pyramid. The second were the Kenites who invaded and occupied the Delta shortly before the Genesis account of Joseph. During the time of Joseph, the Pharaohs at Thebes were of the House of Shem, as was the priesthood of On (Helipolis or Beth-Shemesh). It was these Egyptians whom Joseph was sold to as a slave.

There are nearly 1800 years between the time of Noah’s Flood and the writing of the Pentateuch, and about 800 more to the time of Ezekiel and Jeremiah; all of this time the various tribes of Adamites were seeking new and better land throughout the known world and points beyond. With so few written records, how difficult it is to determine their movement. Homer, the earliest Greek writer we know of, was contemporary with Hosea and Isaiah, rather late in the history of Israel.

It is difficult to discern why the name Phut was associated with Libya (see Nahum 3:9), and in the Septuagint, as well as the A.V., it was translated as such in Ezekiel 30:5; 38:5; Jeremiah 46:9 (LXX 26:9). The Lubim (hence “Libya”) and Sukkim (2 Chronicles 12:3) may have been pre-Adamic (aboriginal) people, and it may well be that our writers of Scripture knew that Phut had mingled with these. Like Kush, Phut is listed among “all the mingled people” in Ezekiel 30:5.

Diodorus Siculus (20:55) writes of Libyans dwelling on Africa’s northern coast, in cities, and friendly to Carthage, but then of the nomadic “Lyvians” of the interior, hostile to Carthage. He does not, however, describe Libyan of Carthaginian physically. Hesoid, probably a contemporary of Isaiah, writing in his “Catalogues of Women” (fragment 40A) mentions both the “boundless black-skins and the Lybians” but says that from Epaphus, son of Chronos, “sprang the dark Libyans and high souled Ethiopians,” but also the “under-ground folk and feeble-souled Ethiopians,” but also the “under-ground folk and feeble pygmies.”

Surely the more reliable early source may be Aeschylus (a writer contemporary with Ezra and Nehemiah). Who in “Suppliant Maidens” at lines 277-290 lists a group of races and compares the likeness of their women to those of the (Greek”) Danaans, among those mentioned being Libyans, Egyptians and Amazons, very likely indicating some degree of homogenization among these people. Aeschylus is relating a parody of events which transpired a thousand years before his own time: the migration of Dan from Egypt to Greece.

In this age we have a mixed race, the Berberrs, as evidence of a former White civilization in this region, although the settlements of the Phoenicians, the later Germanic invaders of Carthage, the Vandals, and then the rise of Mohammedism all did much to further confound an already mingled North African world.

Mitsraim, Kush, and Phut, the Ludim of Genesis 10:13 (not of Lud the son of Shem discussed below), and the Lubim verses (sometimes with other people): Ezekiel 2:10; 390:5; 38:5; Nahum 3:9; 2 Chronicles 12:3 and 16:8. Since Ezekiel 38 is unfulfilled, it may be clear that the Arab (meaning “mixed” see Strongs #6154, the result of which is described in Strong’s #6150) peoples descended from them will be opposed to the children of Israel (not the “Jews”) in the last days.

The Anamin of Genesis 10:13 are likely the “Anami” mentioned in an 8th century B.C., cuneiform inscription. Naphtuhim may be a word borrowed from Egyptian meaning “people of the delta,” Pathrusim “people of the southern land.”

The Philistim, or Philistines, had dwelt in the land of Caphtor before their own migration to Palestine (an unrelated word), and Caphtor was very probably in Egypt. See Amos 9:7; Deuteronomy 2:23 and Jeremiah 47:4. Certainly the Philistines were Adamic (Zechariah 9:6), and some had surely migrated west with the children of Israel (Isaiah 11:14).

Goliath was not actually a Philistine, but rather a mercenary in their army, one of the sons of Rapha the Canaanite giant. Of which see 1 Chronicles 20:4-6, where “the giant” is in Hebrew ha-rapha, the source of the Rephaim (i.e., Genesis 14:5; 15:20; 2 Samuel 5:18; 23:13).

There also should be noted an obscure entry in Herodotus, at 2:128:

“Hence they (the Egyptians) commonly call the pyramids after Philition, a shepherd who at that time fed his flocks about the place.”

Some suppose that this may be a memory of ancient Philistines in Egypt, and the first “shepherd kings,” connected to the building of the Great Pyramid.

With Nimrod we may very well have mention of both the first Adamite tyrant, a man who would rule over his kin outside of the laws of God, and the first multi cultural “empire,” since the cities mentioned had long existed and were populated with peoples of other races. There is much evidence that the beginnings of “western” civilization appeared rather suddenly here in Mesopotamia, by which the Genesis 11 account has much creditworthiness once it is realized that this represents the beginning of the White Race, AND NOT ALL RACES.

Genesis 10:15-19

Genesis 10:15‑19

15: And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth,

16: And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite,

17: And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,

18: And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad.

19: And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha.

Canaan, Ham’s youngest son, was cursed by Noah. The reason why Canaan, and not Ham himself and his other sons, was cursed should be apparent reading Leviticul 20:11. Canaan was the result of Ham’s illicit behavior; warranting his special mention at Genesis 9:18. Canaan’s descendants are later found mixed with the race of Cain (Genesis 4:16-26; 15:19-21; Deuteronomy 7:1-2), who was also cursed (Genesis 4:10-15), and several races with no Biblical genealogy, indicating that they are of non-Adamic (non-white) origin.

Some of the “ites” here in Genesis 10:16-18 also may well be of non-Adamic stock, races that the Canaanites mixed with rather than races which sprung from Canaanites mixed with rather than races which sprung from Canaan. The “Hivites” may actually, in all occurrences, be a Scribal error for “Horities,” evident by comparing Genesis 36:2, 20, 30, and also the LXX at Genesis 34:2 and Joshua 9:7.

The Horites, Hurrians to the anthropologists and archaeologists today, are an Oriental race which invaded Mesopotamia at an early date. Some Horites dwelt at “Mount Hor,” to which the Edomites, the descendants of Esau, and also cursed, joined themselves. Mount Hor was later called Mount Seir, and today is known as Petra in Jordan. See Genesis 36

All of these people aforementioned may be traced to the people we call “Jews” today, although many are also among the “Arabs.” See Matthew 23:35; Luke 11:57; John 8:33-47; Romans 9:1-13; and Josephus’ Antiquities 13:9:1 (13:254-58), 13:15:8 (13:395-97), 15:7:9-10 (15:253-66) and Wars 2:20:4 (2:566-68), 2:8:2 (2:119-121) and 4:4:4 (4:270-73)

Heth was a precursor to the people who were later known as Hittites, probably a pre-Adamic tribe whom Heth had settled with, and therefore named by the rest of the Adamic race. The name Sidon is found in the city in Canaan of the same name, and its environs. Seen hundred years before the Greeks first wrote of “Phoenicians,” the Canaanites of Tyre and Sidon and the rest of the coast were driven out by the children of Israel, who then inhabited those cities. The “Phoenicians” were Israelites!

Summary of What Has Been Presented

This concludes for this part of the study the notes by William Finck, along with some of our own appended observations.

If you have followed very closely what has been presented here, you are probably beginning to acquire a concept of how serious a problem we are facing today concerning race. As has been pointed out RACE is at the very heart of the agenda of the enemy. Additionally, by understanding our past in a greater light, we can observe more thoroughly and with better perception the process which is happening in our world today before our very eyes.

It should also be comprehended by all White People that the present race-mixing phenomena we are confronted with was designed and advocated as far back as prior to the Civil War. As a matter of fact, that is what the Civil War was all abut. But, as one can quickly observe from this lesson, its origin goes back beyond, and is linked with Genesis 3:15 in the Garden of Eden.

While we do not agree fully with Philip Jones in his book Racial Hybridity, (and he being at the opposite end of the spectrum to his brother, Stephen E. Jones), we cite, in part, a couple of passages from the chapter “The Challenge To Destroy The White Race,” on pages 215 and 217:

“One of the foremost exponents of race-mixing was David Croly (1829-1889). His book Miscegenation honestly informs us of the reasons behind the Civil War and giving Negroes ‘rights.’ Croly admits:

“It is idle to maintain that this present (Civil) war is not a war for the Negro. It is (indeed) a war for the Negro. Not simply for his personal rights or his physical freedom...it is a war, if you please, of amalgamation, so called...a war looking, as its final fruit, to the blending of the white and black...Let it go on until...church... state...society recognize...the necessity of the fusion of the white and black.’...

‘The ideal or type (of) man of the future will blend in himself all that is a passionate and emotional in the darker races, all that is imaginative and spiritual in the Asiatic races, and all that is intellectual and perceptive in the White races. He will also be composite as regards color. The purest Miscegen will be brown, with reddish cheeks, curly and waving hair, dark eyes, and a fullness and suppleness of form not now dreamed of by any individual people.”

Is this what you want for your children and grand children????