Conspiracy

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

The word Of Blood

The Wake-Up Herald

And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light. Let us walk honestly, as in the day; not in rioting and drunkenness, not in chambering and wantonness, not in strife and envying. But put ye on the Lord Jesus Christ, and make not provision for the flesh, to fulfill the lusts thereof. Romans 13:11-14

_______________________________________________________________________



Robert McCurry, Editor & Publisher

January 12, 2011

_______________________________________________________________________



Comparing Bloodshed

By Robert McCurry

The main suspect in the January 8, 2011, Arizona massacre, Jared Lee Loughner, 22, was taken into custody moments after the shooting at a political meeting held by Democratic Representative Gabrielle Giffords in a supermarket parking lot. Six people died and Giffords had a critical head wound and remains in intensive care. In total, 19 people were shot in the rampage.

Among the six people killed was one of Giffords' aides and Arizona's chief federal judge, John Roll, as well as Christina-Taylor Green, a 9-year-old girl who was born on the day of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. She recently was elected to the student council at her elementary school; she wanted to talk to Gifford about her interest in public service.

The purpose of this article is not to ignore or minimize the seriousness of the pain of the injured or the survivor’s grief of family members killed by this meaningless and senseless tragedy. The purpose is to ask, ‘Lord, what are you saying to America?’

America and the world are shocked by this rampage and massacre and many tears have been shed over the loss of six lives. This is as it should be. But where are the tears for the four thousand babies that were killed by abortion in America on the same day and the day before and the day after and every day of the year?

America has ignored God’s clear commandment: “Thou shalt not kill” (Ex 20:13). More than sixty million babies have been killed by abortion since January 22, 1973; the ‘blood of the innocents’ cry out against America.

“Hear ye the word of the LORD … Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel; Behold, I will bring evil upon this place … Because they have forsaken me, and have estranged this place, and have burned incense in it unto other gods, whom neither they nor their fathers have known … and have filled this place with the blood of innocents; They have built also the high places of Baal, to burn their sons with fire for burnt offerings unto Baal, which I commanded not, nor spake it, neither came it into my mind” (Jer 19:3-5).

God has given America solemn warning: ‘…Since you did not hate bloodshed, bloodshed will pursue you.’ (Ezekiel 35:6b).

No one is safe anywhere. Blood is coursing down the corridors of our schools, workplaces, malls and streets. We are powerless to stop it. We have sown bloodshed in the womb and we are reaping its horrible harvest in our streets. We are reaping the horrible consequences of what we have sown.

God has not been silent. He has been speaking in thundering tones and writing across the heavens in box car letters in recent times. Remember the April 20, 1999, Columbine school massacre? When the day was done, twelve students, one teacher, and the two murderers were dead. Remember the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks? 2,976 died. These were strong warnings from God to America to repent; but the government approved, funded and protected abortion bloodshed industry has continued unabated, thanks to passive, silent pastors and church members who are apparently more interested in their ‘bless me meetings’ than the cries of the murdered aborted babies.

God’s message to America? It is folly and fatal to ignore God. “He, that being often reproved hardeneth his neck, shall suddenly be destroyed, and that without remedy” (Prov 29:1).

“Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil” (Eccl 12:13-14).



Wake-up, Pastors! Wake-up, Christians!

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

IF ONLY

 
Posted by Picasa

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Photobucket for Lillee tea

Useful Idiots

Useful Idiots, the Corrupt Liberal Establishment, are orchestrating its death. Moreover, in the coup de grace planned by the Confederacy of Evil the Homosexual Agenda plays a crucial part.

The spirit of tyranny reigns supreme in today's Corrupt Liberal Order in the Corrupt Liberal Democracies that now makes up what is called Western World. It is carefully hidden and exercised in subtle ways but it is there. The Power Elite moving the world into total tyranny do not wish to alert the masses to their almost total enslavement. They understand completely that:

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
Blogger Directory

Homosexual agenda 2

The Homosexual Lobby has become a powerful force in Western World. However, ultimately, this power is not theirs, for , the people with the real power in the world, the Power Elite, have allowed the homosexual activists to garner for themselves what power they have vicariously. If the evil men who control society, the Power Elite, the Global Elite, did not want homosexuals to have this political power they would not have it. Therefore, there is a reason for the sudden rise in the power and expectations of the sodomite.

The reason why the Homosexual Lobby has been gifted such power is this. The Global Elite that control much of the temporal affairs of the world and especially the political process, media and academia of the Corrupt Liberal Democracies that now make up Western Civilisation are the front group for a much darker, concentrated power. Behind this coterie of wealthy and powerful people –the likes of the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds- are a few men who truly control much of the temporal affairs of this world. These very few men are the true Lords of Power on Earth.. Gentle reader, the true temporal power on Earth is not found and exercised in parliaments, senates, and congresses, but in the Dark Empire of the Secret Societies. Moreover, true world power is held by very few men; by a Secret Cabal of Power.

These are the Secret Masters of the Dark Empire of Secret Societies. The Occult Hierarchy, the Black Adepts of the Cult of Evil, which is the ancient Luciferian Priesthood who can claim an ancient lineage of service to Evil going far back in history, back before recorded history began. They are the custodians and guardians of Ancient Plan to Transform Society, which is the five thousand year old Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government that intends to set up World Empire and eradicate all human liberty and freedom from the face of the Earth. To do this, they must destroy Natural Moral Order on Earth set in place by the supreme Will of God.

Organised Evil sits at the heart of the dark Empire of Secret Societies and the Occult Hierarchy is at its head. They are main human agents of Evil on Earth and the orchestrators of the Evil Agenda for the establishment of World Government. They are the arbiters of the Ancient, Sinister Plot to Change the World. That is, they orchestrate the five thousand year old Luciferian Conspiracy for World Government that is often called the New World Order. In other words, they seek to establish conditions on Earth that will be propitious for the establishment of a World Empire under their direct control, that is, the Last Secular Global Kingdom on Earth, which is the Kingdom of Antichrist on Earth.

The New Age One World Conspirators seek the destruction of what they call the "Old World Order," which is Natural Moral Order on Earth set in place by the supreme Will of God. Hence, for centuries, the Confederacy of Evil has marshalled its hosts, and organised itself for its calculated assault on Natural Moral Order, its assault on the Church of Christ and its assault on Western Civilisation. This ancient assault on Moral Order is multifaceted. It is the five thousand year old Luciferian Conspiracy, the Evil Agenda for the establishment of World Government, called by insiders the "Great Plan."

A major target of Organised Evil is Natural Moral Order. It has to destroy this before they can claim victory on Earth over God. Thus, the Confederacy of Evil marshalled by the Occult Hierarchy, the Black Adepts of the Cult of Evil, the ancient Luciferian Priesthood who are the main human agents of Evil on Earth, has worked ceaselessly to bring moral decay to the world, but especial to the Western World. Chief amongst these strategies to destroy Natural Moral Order and so destroy Western Civilisation is homosexuality.

The Lords of Power on Earth have chosen Homosexuality to be the ''inner foe'' of moral, ordered society. Moreover, they have foisted it upon modern society by a carefully orchestrated strategy. They have empowered, financed and heavily promoted the Homosexual Lobby, the shocktroops of this unholy and immoral assault on Natural Moral Order on Earth.

Sodomite at Mardi GrrasThe ancient interdiction of homosexuality was predicated on Scripture: and especially the condemnation by God that it is as one of the most loathsome sins. The term Sodomite was not only censorious but also damning when used. The grave connotations attached to this term are the main reason why the Homosexual Lobby has vigorously attempted to render its use Politically Incorrect.

The practice of homosexuality is not merely a political concern but a profoundly spiritual concern. Homosexuality is a spiritually deadly condition that threatens, for different reasons, both its zealots and its enemies. It is this capacity to do great evil to a morally ordered society that homosexuality has been used as an instrument of destruction by the dark spiritual forces plotting to destroy Natural Moral Order on Earth. Very wicked men who are the human agents of Evil have actively supported the rise of the Homosexual Lobby by channelling funding from the great "tax exempt foundations" to support the political and ideological assault on Natural Moral Order on Earth. The Homosexual Lobby has been cultivated and empowered by powerful forces that want to use it as an agent of change and the prominent activists as "change agents." This is the function of another great lie called Humanism, which is the Rationalist attack on the faith of religion and of the concept of God and the Incarnation of Christ.

Homosexuality is one of many weapons in the armoury of Evil in its assault on Ordered Creation on Earth. Moreover, it is also fundamental to the wicked and evil strategy of the Confederacy of Evil to collapse Western Civilisation. Hence, their lackeys and Useful Idiots posing as Humanists and Professional Liberals use it to attack Natural Moral Order on Earth. The Humanist and the Professional Liberal in the guise of "social libertarians" have sought to move the argument over the morality of Sodomy out of the philosophical and religious arenas and into the political arena.

The rationalist attacks upon organised religion and the successes of science have left the Churches exhausted and secretly shamed. They have all but given up the fight to stop the Homosexual Agenda from succeeding. The Anglican Church is almost destroyed by the twin threats to moral, ordered society: Feminism and Homosexuality. It is a grave situation indeed.

Humanist-Homosexual-Agenda

WAS THERE WAR IN HEAVEN? ARE THERE FALLEN ANGELS?

The Case, Revelation 12:7-10:

One of the miss-understood Doctrines held by well meaning Christians, is the idea that at some time in the past, before the creation of mankind, many messengers (1/3rd of the angels) were cast out of heaven for rebelling against G-d. The ring-leader, or master chief of these rebelling messengers, was the Devil of mythical belief. This radical idea is taken from the words of Rev. 12:7-10, part of which reads as follows:

From the KJV Version:

"And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon and the dragon fought and his angels, and prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him." KJV

From "The Scriptures" Version:

"And there came to be fighting in the heaven: Michael and his messengers fought against the dragon. And the dragon and his messengers fought, but they were not strong enough, nor was a place found for them in the heaven any longer. And the great dragon was thrown out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who leads all the world astray. He was thrown to the earth, and his messengers were thrown out with him."

A more Literal Translation:

"And there was strife in the heaven (1); [one] who is like El (2) and his messengers (3) fought against the serpent beast (4) and the serpent beast and his messengers fought and were not strong enough, neither was a place found of them any longer in the heaven. And the great serpent beast was cast - the old snake, (5) (the one being called accuser (6) and adversary), (7) the one deceiving the habitable whole, (8) was cast into (9) the earth, (10) and his messengers, were cast with him."
WERE MESSENGERS (ANGELS) REALLY CAST OUT OF HEAVEN?

While it sounds simple and easy to understand and may at face value appear to indicate that there is truth behind the theory that "messenger beings were put out of heaven," there are two very basic reasons why such a miss-understood idea is simply not true.

1). The book of Revelation, from which the idea is developed, does not support the theory that any celestial messengers were cast out of heaven, that is, the abode or dwelling place of the Supreme Creator Yahweh. John was told when he was given the Revelation, that all of it was a Revelation of "things which must shortly come to pass," Rev.1: 1; beginning at about AD 67, which is the approximate time the book was written. To use this passage to prove an imaginary event, or a proof for a prophecy of something that was supposed to have happened sometime before creation, cannot be supported, must fail.

The identity of this "dragon" which is reference to a mystical, allegorical, snake like beast, (or a reference to a corrupted religious system that was "looked upon") as is suggested by the etymology of the Greek word "dragon," is revealed in Rev. 12:10. The dragon or "serpent beast" is defined as the "accuser of our Brethren." The "accuser" of "our brethren" during the time which John was writing Revelation, was non other the Edomite Priesthood, together with the Scribes and Pharisees, called snakes by Yahshua, (Matt. 23: 33). This corrupted Religious System, supported by the Roman occupation, had infiltrated, corrupted, and usurped the Lawful Yahudi Religious authority, and was using the pagan Roman occupation of Jerusalem, to condemned thousands of believers in Yahshua Messiah to death. Verses 7-9 simply reveal to us, that the "power" of this evil paganism, using the diabolical ferocity of the Roman system to kill True Believers, was eventually replaced by Religion of Christianity, which took full root after 70 AD, though imperfect as it has become. The terrestrial messengers following the "michael" overcame the "Dragon" not by arrows, bullets, or military might, but "...by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death." Rev. 12: 11. This struggle was one for power and for control of the Religious authority, the high or upper (heavenly) realm. The old Yahudim sacrificial system was in the process of becoming replaced by the new covenant through Messiah, Heb. 8: 13. The false leaders of the passing system were struggling for their very survival. The ultimate result - TRUTH in Yahshua, will eventually always prevail! The early followers of Messiah, the first fruits, overcame the "Dragon" (the snake beast) which was the corrupted Religious system. This victory came at great personal loss, the lives, of many of the early believers in Yahshua. However, because of their faithfulness, the corrupted "high authority" (heaven), that which was "looked on" came crashing down to earth..."was cast down to earth," (stripped from their high place of authority "...neither was a place found of them any longer in the heaven. " Rev. 12: 8.

2). The second reason why the commonly believed idea of "fallen celestial messengers" cannot be true, is that it is obvious from Psalms 148: 2-5, that celestial messengers were specially created as spiritual entities to serve the Master Creator Yahweh (G-d)...."He commanded and they were created".... messengers...hosts...sun...moon...stars...heavens...and waters....... We are told: "Thou hast created all things and for thy pleasure they are and were created," Rev. 4:11. The purpose of the special creation of celestial messengers by Yahweh is explained by the Apostle Paul..."Are thy not "all" ministering spirits sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation."

It is not realistic to assume that Yahweh created one bad "celestial messenger" and one good one, and one bad, and so on. NO..... He created perfect, immortal, celestial messenger beings, the like of which we hope to be when Yahshua rewards those who have loved and served Him. If it were possible for "celestial messengers" to sin, then what is the value for us of being made "like unto the messengers"? Why even resist sin at all in this life, supposedly secure in the hope, that we will be made like unto the messengers, (Luke 20:35) if we are simply exchanging one sinful nature for another? This cannot be the case at all, for Yahweh created these pure spiritual celestial beings, (who at times by the way, are given great power to do justice, to kill, and destroy), to be in His presence, and to serve him. Habakkuk says about Yahweh..."Thou art of purer eyes than to behold evil and canst not look on iniquity." (Hab.1: 13).

It is quite clear that the "celestial messengers" that are in the presence of the Father were AND ARE, pure, sinless, and immortal beings. They are created to do the expressed will of the Father, and do not deviate from it. There could never have been messengers thrown out of heaven for sinning or rebelling against the Father, their Creator and Supreme Authority. It is impossibility.... It did not happen.
CHAINS OF DARKNESS = DEATH

The Apostle Peter speaks of the messengers also.".... if G-d spared not the angels (messengers) that sinned but cast them down to hell (11), and delivered them into CHAINS OF DARKNESS, to be reserved unto Judgement,"2 Peter 2:4, and Jude, obviously referring to the same subject matter, writes.....".... the angels (messengers) which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the Judgement of the great day.".... (Jude.v.6). Again, the casual reading of these verses will immediately appear to those looking for "proof" of their idea, that celestial messengers (angels) DID sin and were cast out of heaven, but is this really the correct understanding of the passages?

The first thing that meets you in the verses, is, that the "messengers" spoken of, were cast down to hell, not the earth, and they were placed in chains of darkness. In the second quotation, these same "messengers" left "something" and were then placed in chains under darkness. Job, David and Luke all make reference to "darkness," which they associate with death. The language of Peter and Jude in the passages under review, imply that the "messengers" here spoken of were cast down (thrown or cut down), sent to "hell," the Biblical term for the grave. These messengers are bound by the chains of "death" waiting the Judgement day. What then were these two Apostles Peter and Jude talking about?
KORAH'S REBELLION

In Jude we find that the devil...or "adversary," disputed about the body of Moses. This however, was not the flesh and blood dead body of Moses, but the "Body" in which dwelt the authority in the Tabernacle in the wilderness. In other words, they were adversaries to the wise rule of Moses "in all things spiritual" within the "allegorical body" of the Children of Israel. That this is the true meaning of this passage is proven in the Jude's 11th verse, where he refers to the "gain-saying of Core" or, "destroying themselves in the rebellion of Korah."

The simplicity of the subject then becomes clear. Both Peter and Jude are referring to those (messengers), the instigators or trouble makers, who sinned in the wilderness, defying the authority of Yahweh, that was given through Moses. The ground opened up for these sinners and enveloped them within the chains and the darkness of death, where they wait for the Judgement day when Yahshua the Anointed will judge the righteous and the unrighteous. Read about the disobedient rebellion, and the result of this momentous occasion, written in Numbers 16:1-3 and 31:35, when the ground swallowed Dathan, Abiram and their families.

Conclusion

John, in Revelation 12, is writing about the "soon" to come 70 AD destruction of the accuser, the Serpent Beast, the metaphorical "dragon," a metaphor used by John to describe the corrupted Edomite Priesthood, the Scribes and Pharisees, (the corrupted Religious authority) and its terrestrial "false" messengers (angels). ".... I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Yahudim, and are not, but an Assembly of the Adversary." (Rev. 2: 9).

The reference to the phrase "the heaven" is not referring to the place, abode, or dwelling place of the Almighty Creator Yahweh, but is a reference to that which is "above," as in the religious authority. Like the unbelievers of Ancient times during Moses, these adversaries, or false "terrestrial messengers," will be cast down into the earth from their "high place of authority" (the heaven) waiting in the earth (the grave), for their ultimate demise of Judgement by Yahshua, for good or, for evil, (2 Cor. 5:10).

End Notes

(1). Heaven, ouranos oo-ran-os', Greek, perhaps from the same as oros, or'-os, to rise, (through the idea of elevation); the sky;
the vaulted expanse of the sky with all things visible in it, the universe, the world, the aerial heavens or sky; the region where the clouds and the tempests gather, and where thunder and lightning are produced; the sidereal or starry heavens; the region above the sidereal heavens; the seat of order of things eternal and consummately perfect; where God dwells and other heavenly beings.

(2). Michael, mikh-ah-ale' who is like El" of Hebrew origin - as used in Scripture, is a name for several OT characters. It is also a general term, or a phrase, where the meaning rather than the name can be applied to anyone, who for the moment represents a leader for a cause, or at times is a leader for the cause of, or under the direction of Yahweh to correct wickedness. The term as used in this sense, may not belong to any one particular messenger, being celestial or terrestrial, but will then be a kind of "name type" used for a Champion, as a Captain, or a Prince of Yahweh's people. It is so employed in this passage, so as to denote Him who is the "Captain" of our salvation.

(2a). El, ale, short form of elohim, Hebrew, strength, mighty, also the Almighty Yahweh, (but also used for any deity, i.e. "a g-d").

(3). Messenger, angel, angelos ang'-el-os, Greek, messenger, envoy, one who is sent, may be celestial beings sent from Yahweh, or terrestrial beings sent from man.

(4). Dragon, drakon drak'-own, Greek, from an alternate form of derkomai; (to look), metaphorically, a dragon, a great serpent, serpent beast, or a name for an adversary.

(5). Snake, ophis, of'-is, Greek, probably from Strong's 3700 (through the idea of sharpness of vision); a snake, serpent, figuratively (as a type of sly cunning) an artful malicious person; metaphorically with the ancients, the serpent was an emblem of cunning and wisdom in the negative sense.

(6). Accuser, devil, diabolos dee-ab'-ol-os, Greek, false accuser, slanderer, a calumniator (a through caster); metaphorically applied to someone, who, by appearing to oppose the cause of good, may be said to act the part of an accuser,

(7). Adversary, satan, Satanas sat-an-as' of Aramaic origin corresponding to Strong's 4566 (with the definite affix); adversary; one who opposes another in purpose or act.

(8). Habitable whole, accurate translation of the Greek, many times translated as "the whole world." The reference here is to the known populated area of those to whom the message is addressed. To extend this understanding as global influence is conjecture.

(9). Into, eis, eis, Greek, preposition with the accusative, into, to, in, at, on, upon, by near, among, against, concerning, as.

(10). Earth, gen, ges, Greek, the earth, land, country, region, soil, ground, metaphorically man in general.

(11). Hell = the grave, or, to be covered.

The Beast

The Word "Beast" and Scripture

The word 'Beast'
BEAST, CHAY-AH

The word "beast" appears throughout English written scriptures and often appears translated as simple "Beast," or "Beast of the Field," or "Beast of the Earth." However, three different Hebrew words are incorrectly translated into the English word BEAST in many Bible Translations, one combined Hebrew word, and one Greek word.

1. The Hebrew word CHAY-AH, which means LIFE, LIVING CREATURE, EARTH LIFE-EARTH DWELLER;

2. The Hebrew word BEHEMA, which means quadrupeds (like cattle);

3. The Hebrew word BEIR which means a BRUTE BEAST.

4. The Hebrew phrase NEPHESH CHAY-AH, means LIVING BREATHERS, it is used, of animals, both aquatic and land, as well as hu-mans (see Gen 1:24; 2:7). The common English translation of "soul" is incorrect-except when taken in the restricted sense of "one being."

5. The Greek word ZOE translated BEAST which means LIVING, LIFE, LIVING CREATURE, is the root of our English word for "Zoo".

In tracing these words through the Scriptures, it is important to note that Scripture speaks of both quadruped (four-footed) beast and biped (two-legged) beasts. If you fail to distinguish between beasts (quadruped) and beasts (biped) in the Scriptures, you have missed the truth. Of primary Importance is the Hebrew word CHAY-AH, which means LIVE, LIVING CREATURE, EARTH LIFE-EARTH DWELLER. This word refers to biped (two-legged) Earth Life "beasts" or in other words a hu-man, or man-kind, as distinguished from the word "Adam" (Man).

It is interesting to note that in all of the following Scriptures we find reference to a BEAST that is biped. A (two-legged) BEAST who can talk, riot, commit adultery, co-habit with man, work in vineyards, use his hands, wear clothing, cry unto his creator and sow his seed with other races. Those who have studied the etymology of this Hebrew word CHAY-AH through the scriptures, under the English word "BEAST", know it is speaking of pre-Adamic mankind! If this truth were known and taught from the pulpits of American churches, it would stop the destructive race towards racial suicide through the mongrelizing (intermingling by miscegenation) of the races.

As you study the following scriptures and provide an honest answer to each question, perhaps the full implications of the incorrectly translated word "BEAST" will become very clear to you.

Was Joel speaking of a "beast" or field hand in Joel 2:22?
What kind of a beast do you know that wears clothing (sack-cloth) as we read in Jonah 3:8?
What kind of a beast has hands as reported in Exodus 19:13?
What type of beast is capable of mixing or "sowing" his seed with the "seed of Adam" as described in Jeremiah 31:27?
What kind of a male beast could a woman lust after and "lie down with" and cause YAHWEH to have them executed in righteous judgment? Leviticus 20:16
What kind of a female beast could a man lust after and cause a penalty of death to be decreed by YAHWEH? Leviticus 20:15
What kind of beast would have the ability to "keep the vineyard" as we find in the Song of Solomon, Chapter 1, who incidentally was Black?
What kind of a beast "cries mightily unto YAHWEH" in Jonah 3:8-10?
What kind of a beast would have "eyes full of adultery", as recorded in 2 Peter 2:12-14?
What kind of beast loves to riot in the daytime? 2 Peter 2:12-14
What kind of a beast can talk or speak? 2 Peter 2:12
What kind of a beast was made to be taken and DESTROYED? 2 Peter 2:12

SUMMARY

From these passages it is clear, that the word translated BEAST in many translations, does not refer to a quadruped (4 legged animal). The word clearly refers to Hu-man, Man-kind, a biped (2 legged Hu-man being). It is our understanding of the Hebrew, that this word CHAY-AH, clearly refers to a race of Hu-man beings. It does not refer to the Adamic race, the race of Adam (Man).

pre Adamite race

fore beginning a discussion of Ham, or his son Kush (or Cush), it is quite important to acquire an understanding of the word “Ethiopian,” as the Greeks called the Kushites, as the word is often translated in our Bibles and as we call the people inhabiting the land of Kush in Africa today. Our “Ethiopian” comes form the Greek word ΑίθίΨ which properly means “shining face,” “glowing face” or sunburnt face,” AND WAS CERTAINLY NOT USED BY THE EARLIEST GREEK WRITERS TO DESCRIBE THE DARK RACES. There are several words used to describe “black,” “swart,” “dark,” etc., in Greek which are applied to people. Among them are (here are several Greek words that I don’t have the knowledge to put the proper Greek letters here so will just leave them out). There are other words meaning “dark,” but seemingly not applies to people.

Words related to “fiery burning...of metal, flashing, glittering...” ; “to light up, kindle...;” “clear sky, fair weather;” the closest, “fiery-looking, of metal, flashing; of wine, sparkling,” but according to Liddle & Scott, someone recorded in the Greek Anthologies, a late and wide collection of Greek inscriptions mostly from well into the first millennium A.D., either translated or used as “swart, dark.” However this is clearly contrary to the true spirit of the word’s meaning. Applied to Kush, a White man, or bright red or brassy-colored, which is something which happens only to Caucasians in the outdoors and is exactly what one may expect Kushites in Ethiopia to look like.

Moses fled Egypt the land of Ham (Psalm 105:23; 105:27; 106:22), as recorded in Exodus chapter 2, and met with the Midianites, descendants of Abraham and Keturah (Genesis 25:1-2) from whom he took a wife. These Midianites lived in the land of Kush, as an be discerned from Numbers chapter 12. Abraham had sent his sons with Keturah “east-ward unto the east country” (Genesis 25:6), and surely this “east country” is that called Kush in Genesis 2:13, beyond Mesopotamia, to where we have the Hindu-Kush mountains today. Or at least somewhere between the Euphrates and that country, as we will soon see from the Greek writers. Moses did not go to Ethiopia in Africa for his wife, and there are no Midianites ever spoken of here.

In Hesiod’s “Theogony,” probably written in the 8th century B.C., Memnon, legendary king of the Ethiopians, was the son of Eos, or “Light.” In the “Aethiopis” by Arctinus of Miletus, written as a sequel to Homer’s Ilad, Memnon the Ethiopian aided the Trojans in the war against the Greeks, only to be slain by Achilles. Herodotus (3:94) mentions the “Ethiopians of Asia,” and although he also describes black and wooly-haired Ethiopians (3:101; 7:70), we will refer to Diodorus Siculus for a more complete picture below. Herodotus calls Susa, the famed capital city (along with Persepolis and also the Median city Ecbatana) of the Persian Empire, the “city of Memnon” (5:53-54), since the Greeks believed that Memnon founded that city.

Diodorus Siculus, relating the tradition concerning Memnon, has Ethiopia in Asia sending aid to the Trojans, including Assyrians and “men of Susiana.” (2:22:1-5; 4:75:4) So the Greeks have many witnesses of an Ethiopia in Asia, in lands and cities known to be inhabited by Caucasians, and with people taking part in some of the first events recorded by the Caucasians of Europe. Thus, the Hebrews have a Kush in a land which may be supposed to be the same as the Greek, if not close, yet the Hebrew record is not much earlier than the events the Greeks were recording. As a third witness, we have a Kush on our own modern maps not much further east than where we may assume that the ancient district was situated. This surely can not be coincidental, especially considering the reference in Genesis 2:13, mentioned previously.

Now to turn to the Kush, or Ethiopia, of Africa. In the first eleven chapters of his third book, Diodorus draws from earlier historians (as he always did) to describe the various peoples of African, Ethiopia and the various tribes contrast with one another quite starkly. The first “Ethiopians” he discusses are endowed with what we may consider a well-developed form of “western civilization,” for he states “they say that they were the first to be taught to honor the gods and to hold sacrifices and processions and festivals.”

They quote Homer in reference to themselves (Iliad 1:423-24), they recount the unsuccessful invasions into their country by Cambyses and Semiramis, and they claim that the Egyptians were originally Ethiopian colonists, led by Osiris. The two types of their writing (like Egypt) popular (demotic) and sacred (hieroglyphic), are described, and it is said that the sacred is common among these Ethiopians.

Their priests were much like the Egyptian. They believed that their kings gained sovereignty by Divine Providence, their laws and punishments were from custom, and they practiced the same flight of refuge which the Greeks did, which was similar to the Hebrew Levitical cities of refuge. An Ethiopian king under Ptolemy was educated in Greece and studied Philosophy, and aside from a few odd customs there is no reason to believe that these Ethiopians, whose physical characteristics were not mentioned, were anything but civilized, and not much different than the rest of “western” society.

Now we know that Ham was a White Man as the son of Noah, and therefore that in the beginning Egypt consisted of White Men; also had white men as their rulers for many centuries known as the shepherd kings.

Psalm 105:23

23: ISRAEL ALSO CAME INTO EGYPT; AND JACOB SOJOURNED IN THE LAND OF HAM.

Psalm 105:27

27: They shewed his signs among them, AND WONDERS IN THE LAND OF HAM.

Psalm 106:22

22: Wondrous works IN THE LAND OF HAM, and terrible things by the Red sea.

In stark contrast to those Ethiopians first discussed, starting at 3:8:1, Diodorus says:

“But there are also a great many other tribes of the Ethiopians, (here it is made apparent that, like ‘Phoenicia’ and other labels, ‘Ethiopia’ has become only a geographic designation), some of them dwelling in the land lying on both banks of the Nile and on the islands in the river, others inhabiting the neighboring country of Arabia (between the Nile and the Red Sea; the land of Ham, and others residing in the interior of Libya (the rest of Africa; and Sudan here). The majority of them, and especially those who dwell along the river, are black in color and have flat noses and wooly hair.”

Here it is evident that Diodorus is describing the Nubians and other wandering black tribes of the region. He continues:

“As for their spirit they are entirely savage and display the nature of a wild beast...and are as far removed as possible from human kindness to one another...and cultivating none of the practices of civilized life...they present a striking contrast when considered in the light of our own customs.”

So surely it seems here that if we do not have a White culture in Ethiopia in an era not long before Diodorus’ own, we certainly have at least a remnant of one. Ezekiel 30 lists Ethiopia among “all the mingled people,”

Jeremiah 25:20‑26

20: And all the MINGLED PEOPLE, and all the kings of the land of Uz, and all the kings of the land of the Philistines, and Ashkelon, and Azzah, and Ekron, and the remnant of Ashdod,

21: Edom, and Moab, and the children of Ammon,

22: And all the kings of Tyrus, and all the kings of Zidon, and the kings of the isles which are beyond the sea,

23: Dedan, and Tema, and Buz, and all that are in the utmost corners,

24: And all the kings of Arabia, AND ALL THE KINGS OF THE MINGLED PEOPLE that dwell in the desert,

25: And all the kings of Zimri, and all the kings of Elam, and all the kings of the Medes,

26: And all the kings of the north, far and near, one with another, and all the kingdoms of the world, which are upon the face of the earth: and the king of Sheshach shall drink after them.

Jeremiah 50:37‑39

37: A sword is upon their horses, and upon their chariots, AND UPON ALL THE MINGLED PEOPLE that are in the midst of her; and they shall become as women: a sword is upon her treasures; and they shall be robbed.

38: A drought is upon her waters; and they shall be dried up: for it is the land of graven images, and they are mad upon their idols.

39: Therefore the wild beasts of the desert with the wild beasts of the islands shall dwell there, and the owls shall dwell therein: and it shall be no more inhabited for ever; neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation.

Ezekiel 30:5

5: Ethiopia, and Libya, and Lydia, AND ALL THE MINGLED PEOPLE, and Chub, and the men of the land that is in league, shall fall with them by the sword.

To briefly revisit the Asian portion of Kush, in his book The Lost Tribes, pp. 148-150, Dr. Moore proposes that the word “Kush” may be the underlying root of “Khazar” and “Cossack” (Kush, Kosa, etc.), and hence the ancestors of those people which later became prominent, and among those set to fulfill the destiny set for them in Ezekiel 38 and other prophecies are very likely revealed.

Surely Mitsrayim, or Mizraim, is Egypt. Where the Old Testament reads “Egypt,” in all places the Hebrew reads “Mitsrayim.” The term “Egypt” is that used throughout Greek literature, “Aegyptus.” Mitsrayim was not Egypt as we know it, but only a much smaller district along both banks of the Nile. The early Greeks seem to have written little about Egypt outside of Thebes and Heliopolis, although we sill have reading to do in that period so can’t comment fully on the matter.

This is much to be said about early Egypt that is beyond the scope of this discussion, but warrants at least a mention. First, early Egypt actually consisted of several alien cultures adverse to one another and eventually amalgamated, which was surely not a good idea. The pharaonic civilization in Egypt appeared rather suddenly, not long after 3000 B.C., consistent with Septuagint chronology. There were actually two groups in early Egypt, centuries apart, remembered as “Hyksos.” The first group little is known about, a noble Adamic race, probably Shemites and maybe even Hebrew, who built the Great Pyramid. The second were the Kenites who invaded and occupied the Delta shortly before the Genesis account of Joseph. During the time of Joseph, the Pharaohs at Thebes were of the House of Shem, as was the priesthood of On (Helipolis or Beth-Shemesh). It was these Egyptians whom Joseph was sold to as a slave.

There are nearly 1800 years between the time of Noah’s Flood and the writing of the Pentateuch, and about 800 more to the time of Ezekiel and Jeremiah; all of this time the various tribes of Adamites were seeking new and better land throughout the known world and points beyond. With so few written records, how difficult it is to determine their movement. Homer, the earliest Greek writer we know of, was contemporary with Hosea and Isaiah, rather late in the history of Israel.

It is difficult to discern why the name Phut was associated with Libya (see Nahum 3:9), and in the Septuagint, as well as the A.V., it was translated as such in Ezekiel 30:5; 38:5; Jeremiah 46:9 (LXX 26:9). The Lubim (hence “Libya”) and Sukkim (2 Chronicles 12:3) may have been pre-Adamic (aboriginal) people, and it may well be that our writers of Scripture knew that Phut had mingled with these. Like Kush, Phut is listed among “all the mingled people” in Ezekiel 30:5.

Diodorus Siculus (20:55) writes of Libyans dwelling on Africa’s northern coast, in cities, and friendly to Carthage, but then of the nomadic “Lyvians” of the interior, hostile to Carthage. He does not, however, describe Libyan of Carthaginian physically. Hesoid, probably a contemporary of Isaiah, writing in his “Catalogues of Women” (fragment 40A) mentions both the “boundless black-skins and the Lybians” but says that from Epaphus, son of Chronos, “sprang the dark Libyans and high souled Ethiopians,” but also the “under-ground folk and feeble-souled Ethiopians,” but also the “under-ground folk and feeble pygmies.”

Surely the more reliable early source may be Aeschylus (a writer contemporary with Ezra and Nehemiah). Who in “Suppliant Maidens” at lines 277-290 lists a group of races and compares the likeness of their women to those of the (Greek”) Danaans, among those mentioned being Libyans, Egyptians and Amazons, very likely indicating some degree of homogenization among these people. Aeschylus is relating a parody of events which transpired a thousand years before his own time: the migration of Dan from Egypt to Greece.

In this age we have a mixed race, the Berberrs, as evidence of a former White civilization in this region, although the settlements of the Phoenicians, the later Germanic invaders of Carthage, the Vandals, and then the rise of Mohammedism all did much to further confound an already mingled North African world.

Mitsraim, Kush, and Phut, the Ludim of Genesis 10:13 (not of Lud the son of Shem discussed below), and the Lubim verses (sometimes with other people): Ezekiel 2:10; 390:5; 38:5; Nahum 3:9; 2 Chronicles 12:3 and 16:8. Since Ezekiel 38 is unfulfilled, it may be clear that the Arab (meaning “mixed” see Strongs #6154, the result of which is described in Strong’s #6150) peoples descended from them will be opposed to the children of Israel (not the “Jews”) in the last days.

The Anamin of Genesis 10:13 are likely the “Anami” mentioned in an 8th century B.C., cuneiform inscription. Naphtuhim may be a word borrowed from Egyptian meaning “people of the delta,” Pathrusim “people of the southern land.”

The Philistim, or Philistines, had dwelt in the land of Caphtor before their own migration to Palestine (an unrelated word), and Caphtor was very probably in Egypt. See Amos 9:7; Deuteronomy 2:23 and Jeremiah 47:4. Certainly the Philistines were Adamic (Zechariah 9:6), and some had surely migrated west with the children of Israel (Isaiah 11:14).

Goliath was not actually a Philistine, but rather a mercenary in their army, one of the sons of Rapha the Canaanite giant. Of which see 1 Chronicles 20:4-6, where “the giant” is in Hebrew ha-rapha, the source of the Rephaim (i.e., Genesis 14:5; 15:20; 2 Samuel 5:18; 23:13).

There also should be noted an obscure entry in Herodotus, at 2:128:

“Hence they (the Egyptians) commonly call the pyramids after Philition, a shepherd who at that time fed his flocks about the place.”

Some suppose that this may be a memory of ancient Philistines in Egypt, and the first “shepherd kings,” connected to the building of the Great Pyramid.

With Nimrod we may very well have mention of both the first Adamite tyrant, a man who would rule over his kin outside of the laws of God, and the first multi cultural “empire,” since the cities mentioned had long existed and were populated with peoples of other races. There is much evidence that the beginnings of “western” civilization appeared rather suddenly here in Mesopotamia, by which the Genesis 11 account has much creditworthiness once it is realized that this represents the beginning of the White Race, AND NOT ALL RACES.

Genesis 10:15-19

Genesis 10:15‑19

15: And Canaan begat Sidon his firstborn, and Heth,

16: And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite,

17: And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite,

18: And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad.

19: And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha.

Canaan, Ham’s youngest son, was cursed by Noah. The reason why Canaan, and not Ham himself and his other sons, was cursed should be apparent reading Leviticul 20:11. Canaan was the result of Ham’s illicit behavior; warranting his special mention at Genesis 9:18. Canaan’s descendants are later found mixed with the race of Cain (Genesis 4:16-26; 15:19-21; Deuteronomy 7:1-2), who was also cursed (Genesis 4:10-15), and several races with no Biblical genealogy, indicating that they are of non-Adamic (non-white) origin.

Some of the “ites” here in Genesis 10:16-18 also may well be of non-Adamic stock, races that the Canaanites mixed with rather than races which sprung from Canaanites mixed with rather than races which sprung from Canaan. The “Hivites” may actually, in all occurrences, be a Scribal error for “Horities,” evident by comparing Genesis 36:2, 20, 30, and also the LXX at Genesis 34:2 and Joshua 9:7.

The Horites, Hurrians to the anthropologists and archaeologists today, are an Oriental race which invaded Mesopotamia at an early date. Some Horites dwelt at “Mount Hor,” to which the Edomites, the descendants of Esau, and also cursed, joined themselves. Mount Hor was later called Mount Seir, and today is known as Petra in Jordan. See Genesis 36

All of these people aforementioned may be traced to the people we call “Jews” today, although many are also among the “Arabs.” See Matthew 23:35; Luke 11:57; John 8:33-47; Romans 9:1-13; and Josephus’ Antiquities 13:9:1 (13:254-58), 13:15:8 (13:395-97), 15:7:9-10 (15:253-66) and Wars 2:20:4 (2:566-68), 2:8:2 (2:119-121) and 4:4:4 (4:270-73)

Heth was a precursor to the people who were later known as Hittites, probably a pre-Adamic tribe whom Heth had settled with, and therefore named by the rest of the Adamic race. The name Sidon is found in the city in Canaan of the same name, and its environs. Seen hundred years before the Greeks first wrote of “Phoenicians,” the Canaanites of Tyre and Sidon and the rest of the coast were driven out by the children of Israel, who then inhabited those cities. The “Phoenicians” were Israelites!

Summary of What Has Been Presented

This concludes for this part of the study the notes by William Finck, along with some of our own appended observations.

If you have followed very closely what has been presented here, you are probably beginning to acquire a concept of how serious a problem we are facing today concerning race. As has been pointed out RACE is at the very heart of the agenda of the enemy. Additionally, by understanding our past in a greater light, we can observe more thoroughly and with better perception the process which is happening in our world today before our very eyes.

It should also be comprehended by all White People that the present race-mixing phenomena we are confronted with was designed and advocated as far back as prior to the Civil War. As a matter of fact, that is what the Civil War was all abut. But, as one can quickly observe from this lesson, its origin goes back beyond, and is linked with Genesis 3:15 in the Garden of Eden.

While we do not agree fully with Philip Jones in his book Racial Hybridity, (and he being at the opposite end of the spectrum to his brother, Stephen E. Jones), we cite, in part, a couple of passages from the chapter “The Challenge To Destroy The White Race,” on pages 215 and 217:

“One of the foremost exponents of race-mixing was David Croly (1829-1889). His book Miscegenation honestly informs us of the reasons behind the Civil War and giving Negroes ‘rights.’ Croly admits:

“It is idle to maintain that this present (Civil) war is not a war for the Negro. It is (indeed) a war for the Negro. Not simply for his personal rights or his physical freedom...it is a war, if you please, of amalgamation, so called...a war looking, as its final fruit, to the blending of the white and black...Let it go on until...church... state...society recognize...the necessity of the fusion of the white and black.’...

‘The ideal or type (of) man of the future will blend in himself all that is a passionate and emotional in the darker races, all that is imaginative and spiritual in the Asiatic races, and all that is intellectual and perceptive in the White races. He will also be composite as regards color. The purest Miscegen will be brown, with reddish cheeks, curly and waving hair, dark eyes, and a fullness and suppleness of form not now dreamed of by any individual people.”

Is this what you want for your children and grand children????

Saturday, January 15, 2011

City of God

Now and the serpent was be more cunning than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?”City of God

serpent was more cunning than any beast of the field

Initiate has mastered the simpler techniques for combining letters and vowels,

Twenty-two Foundation Letters:
He placed them in a circle
like a wall with 231 Gates.
The Circle oscillates back and forth.

If the twenty-two letters are placed in a circle and lines are drawn between each of them in every possible combination, 231 lines will be drawn. These lines are the 231 Gates.

Now the

which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman, “Has God indeed said, ‘You shall not eat of every tree of the garden’?”However, these administrators need something to administrate. Anyway, ALL ADAMITES have the Spirit of Yahweh, and all Adamites will be in the Resurrection, which Yahshua clearly illustrates in Matthew 12:41-42 (Luke 11:31-32) and which Job declares in 19:25-27 and 14:10-15, it being understood that Job was an Adamite but evidently not an Israelite. Because from Abraham’s seed the race was preserved and the Redemption process fulfilled (the murder of Yahweh n the flesh by the children of the dragon), all Adamites were freed of the FALSE ACCUSER and will be resurrected. The bigger picture is barely discussed because the focus is on the preserved Nation, Israel, and ONLY Israel will remarry the Lamb

Paul’s mission to “the nations” (mistranslated as “Gentiles” in most Bibles), was surely directed toward Israel, and those long forgotten Israelite nations descended from Abraham. Yet at Athens (in Acts 17) the natives were actually (for the most part) Ionians, the children of Javan the Japhethite, which is the reason for much of Paul’s unusual discourse here. Most people do not realize that even in those late times, tribal divisions and differences in belief and custom distinguished most Greek cities.

Paul understood that, although today’s “theologians” do not. Without question, most, if not all of the recipients of Pauls’ epistles (and visits) were to long-transplanted Israelites who happened to have among them communities (hence “synagogues”) of recently (at that time) migrated Judeans, some of whom were Judah, and some obviously not.

Understanding the destination of the Genesis 10 nations allows one to appreciate so much greater the Promise by Yahweh of the preservation of Israel, even seeing that a great number of Israel fell victim to destruction also (Carthage, Greece, Italy, the Kelts of Anatolia etc.), so that even we in this age, may be considered but a remnant. With all of the troubles we endure now, SURELY WE WILL YET BE PRESERVED TO FLOURISH AGAIN. We first have to consider that the earth was entirely bastardized, except for eight people at the time of Noah. You might say, at that time, “the White Race was skating on mighty thin ice.” Had there been any other unmixed White people, at that time they would have been on Noah’s Ark. When it says that Noah was “perfect in his generation” (RSV), it meant he and his immediate family were racially pure.

Shortly after the flood, Ham looked upon his father’s nakedness (which was his mother), and his son, Canaan, by that union, was a product of incest. Now if that doesn’t agree with your theology, maybe you better check Genesis 9:22; Leviticus 18:7; 20:11; Deuteronomy 22:30; 27:20; Ezekiel 22:10; 1 Corinthians 5:1; Proverbs 30:20; 2 Samuel 16:22. As a result, Ham’s son Canaan was cursed and kicked out of the family, only to mix with the “serpent seed” of Cain, and Cain was not Canaan and Canaan is not Cain, but their descendants eventually mixed together, acquiring a double-curse.

Eventually, Ham’s name came to mean “black,” not because he wasn’t White, but probably because his descendants mixed with the darker races.

In the Bible (about 1500 B.C.), Egypt is called “the land of Ham.” The Egyptians are recorded to be the descendants of Mizraim, Genesis 10:6, 13-14. It might have a double meaning, inasmuch as the Nile valley about five miles either side consists of very black soil. Yet again, it may be because some of the descendants of Ham settled there, or maybe both. Historically, we know that some of the descendants of Shem settled there and that many of the pharaohs were Shemites, particularly the pharaoh that gave Joseph a wife.

Exodus 11:7 gives us reason to believe that the general population might have indeed been the descendants of Ham, which reads:

“But against any of the children of Israel shall not a dog move his tongue, against man or beast: that ye may knowhow that Yahweh doth put a difference between the Egyptians and Israel.”

We are told by many scholars in books on ancient Egypt that many of the people of Egypt were the same White stock of people as the Israelites. Yet we know this is not entirely true, and that is why it was necessary for the Israelites to settle in an area where the two peoples wouldn’t mix. Evan the standard bible commentaries are aware of this. From The Wycliffe Bible Commentary, page 43, commenting on Genesis 46:31-34:

“Before Joseph presented his family to Pharaoh, he gave them specific directions about how to reply to the ruler’s questions. When asked about their calling, they were to represent themselves as shepherds. Then Pharaoh would likely assign them the land of Goshen as their dwelling place. Goshen would provide excellent grazing for their flocks and herds. They would be together, and therefore well protected FROM MIXING WITH OTHER PEOPLES.”

In the Believer’s Bible Commentary, by William MacDonald, p. 79, we have further confirmation that this was indeed the reason for the Israelites settling in a place where they could be isolated to themselves:

“It was agreed that they would tell Pharaoh that they were shepherds. Since shepherds were despised by the Egyptians, Pharaoh would let them live in the land of Goshen, far away from the royal palace. There in Goshen they were isolated from social intercourse with the Egyptians, first because of their nationality (Genesis 43:32) and because of their occupation.. God (Yahweh) left them in an incubator until they were a strong nation, able to possess the land that He promised to their forefathers.”

We also know that on one occasion when the land of Canaan was having a drought, Abraham and Sarah went to Egypt for relief. Upon the Pharaoh desiring Sarah, he was plagued by Yahweh, whereupon he gave Abraham much wealth and some Egyptian maid servants. Hagar was one of them. Evidently Hagar wasn’t entirely white, as we are given witness in Galatians 4:29:

“But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now.”

This passage can refer to none other than the hassle between Ishmael and Isaac, and the fact that Ishmael didn’t have the “Spirit” is damming evidence that his seed was not pure through his mother. If true, again the White Race was skating on mighty thin ice, for only one person stood between them (the kings and priests) and extinction. It should also be noted that a lot went along with Abraham on that occasion and got himself an Egyptian wife, which mighty explain much concerning the Ammonites and Moabites. There is documentation in some of the old books and papers that show that some of the Ammonites are now the Japanese.

“And when Isaac was five years old he was sitting with Ishmael at the door of the tent. And ISHMAEL CAME TO ISAAC AND SEATED HIMSELF OPPOSITE TO HIM, AND HE TOOK THE BOW AND DREW IT AND PUT THE ARROW IN IT, AND INTENDED TO SLAY ISAAC. And Sarah saw the act which Ishmael desired to do to her son Isaac, and it grieved her exceedingly on account of her son, and she sent for Abraham, and said to him, Cast out this bondwoman and her son, for her son shall not be heir with my son, for thus did he seek to do unto him this day.” (Book of Jasher 20:13)

Again, when Esau despised his birthright, which all race mixers do, only one, in the person of Jacob stood between the White Race of kings and priests and extinction. Are you getting the picture, or need we to draw you a diagram?

How tragic, then, that we would esteem our heritage to such a low degree. How calamitous that we would view our race of no value, and go so far as to promote universalism.

If the seriousness of this matter of race wasn’t understood before, it should be now. And if one is any kind of man at all, he’ll write or call each and every one of the anti-seedliners and universalist so-called ministers or teachers in Identity and let them know he doesn’t appreciate their dangerous position. And if the men won’t do their job, the women will have to step in and do the men’s job for them. After all, you she-bear women, the enemy has intruded between you and your cubs, and it’s time to show your claws.

As this is being written it is quite evident that the anit-seedliners and universalists among us don’t care. All they care about is trying to gain some theological brownie points.

And spurious points at that. And anytime they want to leave the movement, we can thank Yahweh and Greyhound they’re gone.

The Nations of Genesis 10

SONS OF JAPHET: Gomer, Genesis 10:2: Gomer is difficult to document. Gomer’s sons surely occupied what we call southern Russia today. To what extent the early sons of Gomer absorbed alien races can not be estimated, however the entire region was eventually overrun by Asiatics by the end of the first Christian millennium.

On Genesis 10:3, Of the sons of Gomer, the “Jew” Koestler in his book The Thirteenth Tribe, written concerning the “Jewish” migration to Khazakstan, lists tribes which he purportedly documents to be descended from Togarmah, on p. 72, which are: Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazars, Zagora, Bulgars and Sabir, Ashkenaz, surely a compound of the ancient Jewish-Turk-Khazar trading empire (hence Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan now) supplies his name to what are otherwise called the “Russia” (Ashkenazi) “Jews” of today.

Upon a close reading of The History of The Jewish Khazars by D.M. Dunlop one can see that Arthur Koestler relied heavily on this book for much of his information about the Khazars

THE HISTORY OF THE JEWISH KHAZARS:

"...Our first question here is, When did the Khazars and the Khazar name appear? There has been considerable discussion as to the relation of the Khazars to the Huns on the one hand and to the West Turks on the other. The prevalent opinion has for some time been that the Khazars emerged from the West Turkish empire.

“Early references to the Khazars appear about the time when the West Turks cease to be mentioned. Thus they are reported to have joined forces with the Greek Emperor Heraclius against the Persians in A.D. 627 and to have materially assisted him in the siege of Tiflis. it is a question whether the Khazars were at this time under West Turk supremacy. The chronicler Theophanes {died circa A.D. 818} who tells the story introduces them as 'the Turks from the east whom they call Khazars.'...

“A similar discussion on the merits of the different races is reported from the days before Muhammad, in which the speakers are the Arab Nu'man ibn-al-Mudhir of al-Hirah and Khusraw Anushirwan.

“The Persian gives his opinion that the Greeks, Indians, and Chinese are superior to the Arabs and so also, in spite of their low material standards of life, the Turks and the Khazars, who at least possess an organization under their kings. Here again the Khazars are juxtaposed with the great nations of the east.

“It is consonant with this that tales were told of how ambassadors from the Chinese, the Turks, and the Khazars were constantly at Khusraw's gate, (Tabari, i, 899. According to ibn-Khurdadhbih, persons wishing access to the Persian court from the country of the Khazars and the Alans were detained at Bab al-Abwab (B.G.A. vi, 135)) and even that he kept three thrones of gold in his palace, which were never removed and on which none sat, reserved for the kings of Byzantium, China and the Khazars.

“In general, the material in the Arabic and Persian writers with regard to the Khazars in early times falls roughly into three groups, centering respectively round the names of (a) one or other of the Hebrew patriarchs, (b) Alexander the Great, and (c) certain of the Sassanid kings, especially, Anushirwan and his immediate successors.

“A typical story of the first group is given by Ya'qubi in his History. After the confusion of tongues at Babel (Genesis 10:18; 11:19); the descendants of Noah came to Pleg (Genesis 10:25; 11:16-19; 1 Chronicles 1:19; 1:25), son of Eber (Genesis 10:21; 10:24-25; 11:14-17; Numbers 24:24; 1 Chronicles 1:18-19; 1:25; 8:12; Nehemiah 12:20), and asked him to divide (Genesis 10:5; 10:25; 10:32; Exodus 14:21; Deuteronomy 4:19; 32:8; 1 Chronicles 1:19) the earth among them.

“He apportioned to the descendants of Japheth (Genesis 5:32; 6:10; 7:13; 9:18; 9:23; 9:27; 10:1-2; 10:21; 1 Chronicles 1:4-5) - China, Hind, Sind, the country of the Turks and that of the Khazars, as well as Tibet, the country of the (Volga) Bulgars, Daylam, and the country neighboring on Khurasan.

“In another passage Ya'qubi gives a kind of sequel to this. Peleg (Genesis 10:25; 11:16-19; 1 Chronicles 1:19; 1:25) having divided the earth in this fashion (Deuteronomy 32:8), the descendants of 'Amur ibn-Tubal (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5; Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1), a son of Japheth, went out to the northeast.

“One group, the descendants of Togarmah (Genesis 10:3; 1 Chronicles 1:6; Ezekiel 27:14; 38:6), proceeding farther north, were scattered in different countries and became a number of kingdoms, among them the Burjan (Bulgars), Alans, Khazars (Ashkenaz Genesis 10:3), and Armenians.

“Similarly, according to Tabari, there were born to Japheth Jim-r the Biblical Gomer (Genesis 10:2-3; 1 Chronicles 1:5-6; Ezekiel 38:6; Hosea 1:3), Maw'-' (read Mawgh-gh), Magog (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5; Ezekiel 38:2; 39:6; Revelation 20:8), Mawday Madai (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5), Yawan (Javan) (Genesis 10:2; 10:4; 1 Chronicles 1:5; 1:7; Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 27:19), Thubal (Tubal), Mash-j (read Mash-kh), Meshech (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:15; 1:17; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1) and Tir-sh (Tiras). (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5)

“Of the descendants of the last were the Turks and the Khazars (Ashkenaz). There is possibly an association here with the Turgesh, survivors of the West Turks, who were defeated by the Arabs in 119/737, (H.A.R. Gibb, Arab Conquests in Central Asia, London 1923, 83ff. Cf. Chapter IV, n. 96) and disappeared as a ruling group in the same century.

“Tabari says curiously that of the descendants of Mawgh-gh (Magog) were Yajuj and Majuj, adding that these are to the east of the Turks and Khazars. This information would invalidate Zeki Validi's attempt to identify Gog and Magog in the Arabic writers with the Norwegians.

“The name Mash-kh (Meshech) is regarded by him as probably a singular to the classical Massagetai (Massag-et). A Bashmakov emphasizes the connection of 'Meshech' with the Khazars, to establish his theory of the Khazars, not as Turks from inner Asia, but what he calls a Jephetic or Alarodian group from south of the Caucasus.

“Evidently there is no stereotyped form of this legendary relationship of the Khazars to Japheth. The Taj-al-Artis says that according to some they are the descendants of Kash-h (? Mash-h or Mash-kh, for Meshech), son of Japheth, and according to others both the Khazars and the Saqalibah are sprung from Thubal (Tubal). Further, we read of Balanjar ibn-Japheth in ibn-al-Faqih and abu-al-Fida' as the founder of the town of Balanjar. Usage leads one to suppose that this is equivalent to giving Balanjar a separate racial identity. In historical times Balanjar was a well-known Khazar center, which is even mentioned by Masudi as their capital.

“It is hardly necessary to cite more of these Japheth stories. THEIR JEWISH ORIGIN IS PRIORI OBVIOUS, and Poliak has drawn attention to one version of the division of the earth, where the Hebrew words for 'north' and 'south' actually appear in the Arabic text. The Iranian cycle of legend had a similar tradition, according to which the hero Afridun divided the earth among his sons, Tuj (sometimes Tur, the eponym of Turan), Salm, and Iraj. Here the Khazars appear with the Turks and the Chinese in the portion assigned to Tuj, the eldest son.

“Some of the stories connect the Khazars with Abraham. The tale of a meeting in Khurasan between the sons of Keturah (Genesis 25:1; 25:4; 1 Chronicles 1:32-33) and the Khazars (Ashkenaz) (Genesis 10:3) where the Khaqan is Khaqan is mentioned is quoted from the Sa'd and al-Tabari by Poliak.

“The tradition also appears in the Meshed manuscript of ibn-al-Faqih, apparently as part of the account of Tamim ibn-Babr's journey to the Uigurs, but it goes back to Hishim al-Kalbi. Zeki Validi is inclined to lay some stress on it as a real indication of the presence of the Khazars in this region at an early date. Al-Jahiz similarly refers to the legend of the sons of Abraham and Keturah settling in Khurasan but does not mention the Khazars. Al-Di-mashqi says that according to one tradition the Turks were the children of Abraham by Keturah, whose father belonged to the original Arab stock.

Descendants of other sons of Abraham, namely the Soghdians and the Kirgiz, were also said to live beyond the Oxus..." (The History of The Jewish Khazars, by D.M. Dunlop, pp. 4-15. This book is especially important because the Jews make reference to it in all of their Jewish Encyclopedias, and uphold him as an authority on Jewish History)

MAGOG: Genesis 10:2: From the prophets can be discerned to have gone somewhere east into Asia, but where exactly cannot be known. Mongolia and Tibet, home of the ancient mixed races with a clear Adamic cultural influence, my be conjectured.

JAVAN: Genesis 10:2: In the Septuagint called “Iωύαv and in the prophets often where we find Ionian Greeks. Surely since they are called Yavana by the Semitic Persians, Ionians dwelt in a region of Asia Minor and also founded and inhabited Athens and its environs.

TARSHISH: Genesis 10:4: Herodotus wrote of Tartessus as a port city even before the time of the Trojan War (1184 B.C.), surely corroborating King Solomon’s shipping industry. Unfortunately, before the end of the first millennium most Greek lands were overrun by Arabs, Mongols and Turks. The last holdouts, Constantinople and Greece itself, were conquered by the Turks in the 14th and 15th centuries A.D.

MESHECH AND TUBAL: Genesis 10:2: These two we will treat together. Over 1500 years before the Germanic Rus conquered the land which bears their name today, Ezekiel wrote of Rhos (LXX) or Rush (A.V.) Being the leader (“prince”) of Magog, Meshech and Tubal (Ezekiel 38). This by no means coincidental. Whoever Magog may have been in prehistoric times, we can be certain that his descendants are found among those gigantic (“Gog”) mixed masses of Caucasian-Mongol-Chinese what ever blood, who are found inhabiting much of Russia today.

In light of the relationship which the Russ were to have with Magog, Meshech and Tubal, which Ezekiel 38 illustrates, Herodotus mentions two tribes among those under Persian domination, the “Moschi” and “Tibareni” (Herodotus 3:94 and 7:78) in a convenient geographic region that without stretching the imagination, we may associate these ancient Japhethites with the dwellers around the Russian cities of Moscow and Tobolk today, however it is certain that at some point in time all these peoples have mingled with pre-Adamic races related to those of the Orient.

MADAL: Genesis 10:2: That Madai is identifiable with the Medes should be evident simply by checking both terms in Strong’s Concordance. The Greeks wrote “Mede” as Μήόoς, the “η” in English being an “a” or “έ” or “e.”

Herodotus (7:62) wrote that, “Ehese Medes were anciently called by all people Arians” although it was more likely that the term “Aryan” was rather used by Israelites who once sojourned in Medis...the Greeks had Israelites in Media confused with actual Medes.

THE SONS OF HAM: Cush: Genesis 10:6: There were two lands of Cush.

The First: Known to the Greeks (and so to us) as Ethiopia, appears everywhere in the Bible as the word from the Hebrew for Cush. Ethiopia in Africa, ONCE WHITE, as can as can be discerned from the meaning of the Greek word, and from the Bible and Greek historians, was overrun by Nubians in the 8th century B.C. While that did not totally destroy the country during the Christian era all of the White Cushite blood has been lost.

The Second: Cush, at one time, may have been near Mesopotamia, where some of the Midianites dwelt (Exodus 2, Numbers 12) and extended east toward India. This is supported by Genesis 2:13, and the fact that there are Hindu-Kush mountains in northern India today. Distinct from those of Africa, the Greek poets and historians (Hesiod, Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus) often mention the “Ethiopians of the east” and relate that Memnon, King of Ethiopians built Susa, capital city of Persia.

Abraham’s children by Keturah, Midian among them, were sent off to the east (Genesis 25:1-6). Surely Hebrew and Greek historians coincide quite well. Of course, there are no White races left in this area today with which to identify these Cushites. However, Northern India has a long, long history of western influence.

MITRAYIM: Genesis 10:6: Mitrayim is the Hebrew for “Egypt” everywhere in the Old Testament. At that time Egypt was the Nile River valley and the Delta, as far as Elephantine. To what extent the Mizraimites may have mixed with aboriginal populations before Joseph sojourned there can not be estimated. However, the Egypt of Joseph was quite different, and not dominated by Mizraim.

Of the sons of Mizraim, the Anamim were named in an inscription and likely inhabited an area at or in the vicinity of later day Cyrene. The word Naphtuhim seems to be Egyptian for “people of the Delta,” Pathrsim for “people of the southern land.” Caphtor was a district in Egypt, and the Philistim, or Philistines, left Egypt to settle in Palestine The Ludim in Egypt are often mistaken by the translators for Lud, son of Shem

PUT: Genesis 10:6: Often the prophets associated with Libya (a name coming from an alien tribe, the Lubim) as did the early translators, yet it can be demonstrated from early Greeks that civilized Whites did inhabit the Mediterranean coasts of Africa (and were not Phoenicians), an actual linkage of any of these people with the name Put is not yet detected.

CANAAN: Genesis 10:6: Canaan was cursed, and any discussion of him must be reserved for an investigation of the descendants of Cain via admixture. (Genesis 15:19-21)

Of the sons of Cush, Sheba, Genesis 10:7: Sheba (as opposed to the Sheba of Joktan, Genesis 10:28) was a district near Ethiopia in Africa (see Strong’s #7614) and is often mentioned along with Dedan in the prophets. Sheba and Seba are mentioned together at Psalm 72:10. Like Ethiopia, Egypt was also overrun, and ruled for many years, by Nubians (a black race), an event from which she never really recovered, in the 8th century B.C. Eventually all of the Hamites became mingled with the black races of Africa which, along with the Arab incursions and the earlier Phoenician settlements, gives us today’s Berbers, Moors, Ethiopians, and the continent’s many other mixed races.

THE SONS OF SHEM: Elam, Genesis 10:22:

everywhere we find Elam in the Bible, we find people later known as Persians in secular history. Along with Madai (Genesis 10:4) Elam formed the Medo-Persian Empire. Iran, originally Ariana, a part of Parthia was overrun first by Arabs, and later by Mongols and Turks, creating the mixed race which resides there today.

ASSHUR: Genesis 10:22: The Assyrians, who became a great empire, but mixed with the Hittites, Horites (Hurrians) and others at an early time, although surely many pure Assyrians must have existed at the time of the prophet Jonah (3:8), who urged them to repent. Assyria was destroyed, along with its capital Nineveh, about 625 B.C., by the Scythians (Israelites) and the Medes (Madai).

LUD: Genesis 10:22: The Lydians of Asia Minor, only mentioned elsewhere by the prophet Isaiah in 66:19 (an event fulfilled by the Israelite Kelts), all other mention of Lud or (by error) Lydians in the Old Testament are actually Ludim, sons of Egyptian Mizraim. Before the Etruscans were descended from the Lydians as recorded by both Herodotus and Tacitus.

ARAM: Genesis 10:22: Everywhere the word Syria appears in the Bible, the Hebrew word is Aram. This word is also the root of Aramaic, one of the languages of Palestine. Originally Aram was centered in Damascus. The ancient Greeks spoke of Cinyrus, a Syrian who colonized Cyprus, although he may have been a Phoenician, Jacob took wives of “Laban the Syrian,” (Genesis 25:20; 31:20; 31:24)although he too was a descendant of one of Abraham’s brothers.

EBER: Genesis 10:24: From Eber we have the name “Hebrews.” Eber, Strong’s #5677, is the same as a word meaning “across” or “opposite.” Hence we have Eber’s name in many places on the opposite side of the Mediterranean from Palestine: The Iberian Peninsula, the Ebro river in Spain, Hibernia which we know today as Ireland, and Hebrides, Islands off Scotland Later one of the first countries inhabited by the deported Israelites, near the Caucasus Mountains, was also called Iberia, and Diodorus Siculus mentions a Hebrus river in Illyria. Of course, the Israelites descended from Eber.

JOKTAN: Genesis 10:26-29: Only a few of Joktan’s sons will be mentioned here briefly, Sheba was an ancient kingdom in what we know as Yemen. Ophir must have been on the east coast of Africa. It is the source of the name Africa, the original Latin being Afer. Jobab, meaning “father Job,” may very well be the Job of our Book.

Summary thus far on Genesis 10 on what we have here presented: This record in Genesis 10 is, more or less, a “snapshot” of our race as it was originally dispersed after those events which are represented by the Tower of Baabel story recorded in Genesis 11. There are at least 1500 years. However, at the time of Moses, there were no Europeans other than the few Japhethite settlers of the Mediterranean coasts.

It can be shown that all of the Northern and Western Europeans, as well as many of those original Eastern and Southern ones, were actually the children of Israel. For this is one must realize the origins of the Phoenicians, the Danaans, the Dardans (and Dorians and Latins) and then the Scythians and Kelts. These must, of course, will be discussed individually.

With all of the formerly White Adamic nations except those left of Israel completely overrun and destroyed by the other races, and today being among the poorest and lowest, backward, “third world” countries , you would think that finally we would see the importance of being a separate people (Exodus 19:5; 33:16; Deuteronomy 14:12; 26:18; Titus 2:14; 1 Peter 2:9-10). Of course we haven’t’ because we are ignorant of history.

This is only the beginning of volumes that could be written on this subject, which we will continue. This represents only an nucleus which could be expanded into a great study by those interested in preserving our origins. But instead, the White Race is swiftly going to hell in a hand basket, and who really cares? Surely not the anti-seedliners, universalists, multulculturists, and Judeo-Christians.

This should how give you some Idea of who’s Adam and who’s not and who’s Israel and who’s not. Also, it should be very clear that the table of nations in Genesis 10 concerns itself only with the sons of Noah, and they were all White, at least at that time. It would be well, then, to cite the prophecy which states the fact that what was happening immediately prior to Noah’s flood would happen again in the end days.

It is found in Matthew 24:37-38:

37: But as the days of Noe were , so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.

38: For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark.

While much of the prophecy of Matthew 24 has already happened, this passage we are seeing fulfilled before our very eyes The “marrying and giving in marriage” mentioned in these two verses was the miscegenation between angel-kid and Adam-kind which produced mutated giants. Today we are witnessing a similar condition. We recently heard the 90 percent of young people now look with favor on race-mixing. That should give one some idea just where we are on Yahweh’s time-clock.

The Race of Genesis 10

In this study we are going to travel the history of the planet once. There are no second chances; one history; one Bible; one trek from the garden of Eden to the gathering of the Wheat. If we do not find the foundations of our race in Genesis chapter 10, then our history, along with our Bible, is absolutely unreliable and we are mired in futility.

We will begin oral explanations of Genesis 10 by quoting Epictetus, copied from the opening pages of Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament: “the beginning of learning is the investigation of names.”

The chronology of the Greek Septuagint translation of the Bible may be more reliable than the Masoretic Text, and according to many (e.g. Adam Rutherford) from that source the date of the flood of Noah may be fixed around 3245 B.C. So Genesis 10 is a snapshot, a profile of those tribes from which our race (the White Race); the family of Noah, first blossomed in the first few centuries after the Deluge.

The cries of those ignorant ones that says race does not make a difference only show how profound that ignorance is with such a statement. For the Bible is about one race of people ONLY the White Race and not any of the other races or people on earth.

One would think that, five thousand years ago, one would find no “Aryan” or “Caucasian” civilization outside of these Genesis 10 people; and that all of these people are indeed “Aryan” or “Caucasian.”

It is certainly no mistake, that as it may be made evident here, so many of the tribes listed in Genesis 10 are found with names similar to those gleaned from the earliest secular records of our race. Although it is frustrating that some of the Genesis 10 people seem to have vanished at an early time, too early to be identified in secular records uncovered thus far, surely enough of these people may be identified that one may see the truth of these words concerning Genesis 10 fully demonstrated. (Haberman’s Tracing Our Ancestors, p. 9, has it 2344 B.C. likely MT)

Genesis 10:1

Genesis 10:1

1: Now these are the generations of the sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth: and unto them were sons born after the flood.

Genesis 10:2-3

Genesis 10:2‑3

2: The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras.

3: And the sons of Gomer; ASHKENAZ, and Riphath, and Togarmah.

The historian Josephus made the mistake of associating Gomer with the Kelts, an error probably derived from an early Greek name for them, and many of his copyists have followed this same mistake, which is based solely upon this weak phonetic similarity. That the Kelts sprang from a portion of the Children of Israel deported by the Assyrians (see Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets, by E. Raymond Capt) is evident from many factors, including their late (7th century B.C.) Appearance in history, their location today, and their role in early history in fulfillment of many of the prophecies concerning Israel. However that discussion is beyond the scope of our purpose here. Simply note that the “Galatians” of Paul’s epistle are Kelts, and Paul was writing to Israelites.

At this point, we will interrupt William (we are using many of his notes and are not using quotation marks because they are not necessary) for an interesting item found in The Ancient World of the Celts, by Peter Berresford Ellis. While Ellis is a profound researcher and author of many book son the subject, he is blind to the truth that the Celts were Israelites. On page 5 he states:

“I find that it is not stretching the imagination to suggest that when the Greek merchants first started to encounter the Celtic peoples and asked them who they were, the Celts simply replied. ‘The hidden people;’ that is, to Greek ears, Keltol.”

That should immediately set off a signal in our minds, as Psalm 83:3 should instantly be recalled which says:

“They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy HIDDEN ONES.”

While the Kelts had the veil of darkness over them by Yahweh, at least they understood they were “hidden,” and informed the Greeks in an allegorical statement to that fact. This comment by the Kelts is simply amazing we think.

Now, back to Bill: By contrast, in Ezekiel 38,

Gomer is allied with those in opposition to the Children of Israel, which makes it easy to accept the statement which A. Koestler, on page 72 of his book The Thirteenth Tribe (bear in mind that Koestler, a “Jew,” writes from a “Jewish” perspective) claims that Togarmah, Gomer’s son, is the common ancestor of the Uigur, Dursu, Avars, Huns, Basilii, Tarniakh, Khazars, Zagora, Bulgars and Sabir. Surely the Biblical prophecies indicate that Gomer’s descendants are to be found among the Asiatic hordes of this age.

In The History of The Jewish Khazars:

"...Our first question here is, When did the Khazars and the Khazar name appear? There has been considerable discussion as to the relation of the Khazars to the Huns on the one hand and to the West Turks on the other. The prevalent opinion has for some time been that the Khazars emerged from the West Turkish empire.

“Early references to the Khazars appear about the time when the West Turks cease to be mentioned. Thus they are reported to have joined forces with the Greek Emperor Heraclius against the Persians in A.D. 627 and to have materially assisted him in the siege of Tiflis. it is a question whether the Khazars were at this time under West Turk supremacy. The chronicler Theophanes {died circa A.D. 818} who tells the story introduces them as 'the Turks from the east whom they call Khazars.'...

“A similar discussion on the merits of the different races is reported from the days before Muhammad, in which the speakers are the Arab Nu'man ibn-al-Mudhir of al-Hirah and Khusraw Anushirwan. The Persian gives his opinion that the Greeks, Indians, and Chinese are superior to the Arabs and so also, in spite of their low material standards of life, the Turks and the Khazars, who at least possess an organization under their kings. Here again the Khazars are juxtaposed with the great nations of the east.

“It is consonant with this that tales were told of how ambassadors from the Chinese, the Turks, and the Khazars were constantly at Khusraw's gate, (Tabari, i, 899. According to ibn-Khurdadhbih, persons wishing access to the Persian court from the country of the Khazars and the Alans were detained at Bab al-Abwab (B.G.A. vi, 135)) and even that he kept three thrones of gold in his palace, which were never removed and on which none sat, reserved for the kings of Byzantium, China and the Khazars.

“In general, the material in the Arabic and Persian writers with regard to the Khazars in early times falls roughly into three groups, centering respectively round the names of (a) one or other of the Hebrew patriarchs, (b) Alexander the Great, and (c) certain of the Sassanid kings, especially, Anushirwan and his immediate successors.

“A typical story of the first group is given by Ya'qubi in his History. After the confusion of tongues at Babel (Genesis 10:18; 11:19); the descendants of Noah came to Peleg (Genesis 10:25; 11:16-19; 1 Chronicles 1:19; 1:25), son of Eber (Genesis 10:21; 10:24-25; 11:14-17; Numbers 24:24; 1 Chronicles 1:18-19; 1:25; 8:12; Nehemiah 12:20), and asked him to divide (Genesis 10:5; 10:25; 10:32; Exodus 14:21; Deuteronomy 4:19; 32:8; 1 Chronicles 1:19) the earth among them.

“He apportioned to the descendants of Japheth (Genesis 5:32; 6:10; 7:13; 9:18; 9:23; 9:27; 10:1-2; 10:21; 1 Chronicles 1:4-5) - China, Hind, Sind, the country of the Turks and that of the Khazars, as well as Tibet, the country of the (Volga) Bulgars, Daylam, and the country neighboring on Khurasan. In another passage Ya'qubi gives a kind of sequel to this.

“Peleg (Genesis 10:25; 11:16-19; 1 Chronicles 1:19; 1:25) having divided the earth in this fashion (Deuteronomy 32:8), the descendants of 'Amur ibn-Tubal (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5; Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1), a son of Japheth, went out to the northeast.

“One group, the descendants of Togarmah Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5; Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1, proceeding farther north, were scattered in different countries and became a number of kingdoms, among them the Burjan (Bulgars), Alans, Khazars (Genesis 10:3; 1 Chronicles 1:6; Ezekiel 27:14; 38:6), and Armenians.

“Similarly, according to Tabari, there were born to Japheth Jim-r the Biblical Gomer (Genesis 10:2-3; 1 Chronicles 1:5-6; Ezekiel 38:6; Hosea 1:3), Maw'-' (read Mawgh-gh), Magog (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5; Ezekiel 38:2; 39:6; Revelation 20:8), Mawday Madai (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5), Yawan (Javan) (Genesis 10:2; 10:4; 1 Chronicles 1:5; 1:7; Isaiah 66:19; Ezekiel 27:13; 27:19), Thubal (Tubal), Mash-j (read Mash-kh), Meshech (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:15; 1:17; Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2-3; 39:1) and Tir-sh (Tiras). (Genesis 10:2; 1 Chronicles 1:5) Of the descendants of the last were the Turks and the Khazars (Ashkenaz).

“There is possibly an association here with the Turgesh, survivors of the West Turks, who were defeated by the Arabs in 119/737, (H.A.R. Gibb, Arab Conquests in Central Asia, London 1923, 83ff. Cf. Chapter IV, n. 96) and disappeared as a ruling group in the same century. Tabari says curiously that of the descendants of Mawgh-gh (Magog) were Yajuj and Majuj, adding that these are to the east of the Turks and Khazars. This information would invalidate Zeki Validi's attempt to identify Gog and Magog in the Arabic writers with the Norwegians.

“The name Mash-kh (Meshech) is regarded by him as probably a singular to the classical Massagetai (Massag-et). A Bashmakov emphasizes the connection of 'Meshech' with the Khazars, to establish his theory of the Khazars, not as Turks from inner Asia, but what he calls a Jephetic or Alarodian group from south of the Caucasus.

“Evidently there is no stereotyped form of this legendary relationship of the Khazars to Japheth. The Taj-al-Artis says that according to some they are the descendants of Kash-h (? Mash-h or Mash-kh, for Meshech), son of Japheth, and according to others both the Khazars and the Saqalibah are sprung from Thubal (Tubal). Further, we read of Balanjar ibn-Japheth in ibn-al-Faqih and abu-al-Fida' as the founder of the town of Balanjar. Usage leads one to suppose that this is equivalent to giving Balanjar a separate racial identity. In historical times Balanjar was a well-known Khazar center, which is even mentioned by Masudi as their capital.

“It is hardly necessary to cite more of these Japheth stories. Their Jewish origin is priori obvious, and Poliak has drawn attention to one version of the division of the earth, where the Hebrew words for 'north' and 'south' actually appear in the Arabic text. The Iranian cycle of legend had a similar tradition, according to which the hero Afridun divided the earth among his sons, Tuj (sometimes Tur, the eponym of Turan), Salm, and Iraj.

“Here the Khazars appear with the Turks and the Chinese in the portion assigned to Tuj, the eldest son. Some of the stories connect the Khazars with Abraham. The tale of a meeting in Khurasan between the sons of Keturah (Genesis 25:1; 25:4; 1 Chronicles 1:32-33) and the Khazars (Ashkenaz) (Genesis 10:3) where the Khaqan is Khaqan is mentioned is quoted from the Sa'd and al-Tabari by Poliak. The tradition also appears in the Meshed manuscript of ibn-al-Faqih, apparently as part of the account of Tamim ibn-Babr's journey to the Uigurs, but it goes back to Hishim al-Kalbi. Zeki Validi is inclined to lay some stress on it as a real indication of the presence of the Khazars in this region at an early date.

“Al-Jahiz similarly refers to the legend of the sons of Abraham and Keturah settling in Khurasan but does not mention the Khazars. Al-Di-mashqi says that according to one tradition the Turks were the children of Abraham by Keturah, whose father belonged to the original Arab stock. Descendants of other sons of Abraham, namely the Soghdians and the Kirgiz, were also said to live beyond the Oxus..." (The History of The Jewish Khazars, by D.M. Dunlop, pp. 4-15. This book is especially important because the Jews make reference to it in all of their Jewish Encyclopedias, and uphold him as an authority on Jewish History)

Riphath, another of Gomer’s sons, is unmentioned elsewhere in the Bible (except for a copy of Genesis 10 found in 1 Chronicles, chapter 1) Ashkenaz, however, is easily identified. Mentioned in Jeremiah 51:27 along with the Arat and Minni (both part of modern Armenia), Ashkenaz is there shown to be not far from the ancient land of the Khazars, once a great empire and of which modern Kazakhstan is a remnant.

In the first millennium many of the Edomites and Canaanites who had adopted Judaism migrated to Khazaria, and had converted a great many Khazars. The “Jews” being absorbed into the general population, these people later adopted the name Aslenaz, or “Ashkenazi Jews,” for Ashkenaz was recognized as an ancestor of the original Caucasian population of the area.

Over 1500 years before the Germanic Rus conquered the land which bears their name today, Ezekiel wrote of Rhos (LXX) or Rush (A.V.) Being the leader (“prince”) of Gog, Meshech and Tubal. (Ezekiel 38) This is by no means coincidental. Whoever Magog may have been in prehistoric times, we an be certain that his descendants are found among those gigantic (“Gog”) mixed masses of Caucasian-Mongol-Chinese-whatever blood who are found inhabiting much of Russia today.

In light of the relationship which the Rus were to have with Magog, Meshech and Tubal, which Ezekiel 38 illustrates, Herodotus mentions two tribes among those under Persian domination, the “Moschi” and “Tibareni” (Herodotus 3:94; 7:78), in a convenient geographic region that without stretching the imagination, we may associate these ancient Japhethites with the dwellers around the Russian cities of Moscow and Tobolsk today. However, it is certain that at some point in time all of these peoples have mingled with the pre-Adamic races related to those of the Orient.

That Madai is identifiable with the Medes should be evident simply by checking both terms in Strong’s Concordance. The Greeks wrote “Mede” as Μήδoς, the “ή” in English being either an ‘a’ or an ‘έ” or ‘e.’ Herodotus (7:62) wrote that “These Medes were anciently called by all people Arians” although it is more likely that the term “Aryan” was rather used by Israelites who once sojourned in Media (with which Dr. G. Moore agrees in his The Lost Tribes And The Saxon Of The East And The Saxons Of The West), since the term “Arya” seems to be “mountain of Yahweh” in Hebrew (i.e., Daniel 2:45), and that the Greeks had Israelite tribes in Media confused with actual Medes. Regardless, with the Medes fulfilling a destiny in history which the prophets had already assigned to Medai (Isaiah 23; Jeremiah 25:25; 51:11, 28 and Daniel 8), there should be no doubt as to this identification.

It may well be that the Medes are found in the Slavs of today. The Slavs may be, at least in part, traced to a people that Romans and Greeks called Sarmatians (Sauromatae). Diodorus Siculus, discussing certain Sakae (Scythian) kings, (2:43:5-7) states that

“It was by these kings that army of the conquered (by the Scotians) peoples were removed to other homes, and two of these became very great colonies: the one was composed of Assyrians and was removed to the land between Paphlagonia and Pontus, and the other was drawn from Media and planted along the Tanais, its people receiving the name of Sauromatae. Many years later this people became powerful and ravaged a large part of Scythia.”

If this is so, and we have so many Slavs among us today, that such must be the fulfillment of Genesis 9:27, for we Germanic, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon and Keltic peoples are descendants of the Scythian-Israelites, and the true Semites. (For to “dwell in the tents of Shem” implies that Japheth was absorbed and became part of Shem’s family)

The next of Japheth’s sons to be discussed is Javan Strong, in his Concordance, identifies Javan with the Ionian Greeks, and the Septuagint translators seem to also, rendering the Hebrew word #3120 as (Iouan). This is not without reason, for on the Behistun Rock (and other Eastern inscriptions) the Greeks are called “Yavana,” and Sir Henry Rawlinson wrote “Ionians” there in his famous translation of that inscription.

Other Persian inscriptions assure this same connection (see G. Moore’s The Lost Tribes...and E. R. Cap’ts Missing links...). These Ionians once inhabited the coasts of Anatolia (Turkey today) and many of its islands, that land called Ionia generally, and also were the founders and principal inhabitants of Athens.

Of the sons of Javan, all are identified with the sea trade with Tyre in Ezekiel 27; Elishah 27:7, Tarshish 27:12, Kittim (or Chittim) 27:6, and in the Septuagint, “Dodanim.” A mistake by the Hebrew copyists for “Rodanim” (as Strong attests), “Rhodians” in the Septuagint, are also mentioned at 27:15, where the A.V., has “Dedan.” Elishah and Kittim are both identified with the island of Cyprus, with several varying spellings of these names in ancient inscriptions.

“Dodanim,” or “Rodanim,” in the Septuagint “Rhodians,” are the Greeks of Rhodes, and Tarshish is a region of southern Spain known as Tartessus. The Ionians (or Javan) themselves are connected with Tyrian sea trade in Ezekiel 27:13, 19.

The ships of “Tarshish” are mentioned in Kings, Chronicles, Psalms and several of the prophets. Although a separate and quite lengthy topic, it can be convincingly demonstrated that the “Phoenicians” of Tyre and elsewhere were the Israelites; called Phoenicians by the Greeks, right from the pages of the Bible, with much evidence also added by secular historians.

Carthage was a Phoenician colony of Tyre, and the Carthaginians evidently controlled the land we call Spain today, then called Iberia, “Hebrew” or “Eber” land, just as the land south of the Caucasus Mountains, where the deported Israelites first settled and became known as Scotians, was also called Iberia even in Roman times.

Diodorus Siculus (25:10:1 ff.) Discusses wars between the Carthaginian Hamilcar Barca and the “Iberians and Tartessians” in the third century B.C. Herodotus (4:152) is writing about a period much earlier than his won, even predating the Trojan War, and says “This trading town was in those days a virgin port, unfrequented by the merchants.” The Trojan War was 200 years before King Solomon’s ships, so maybe be Herodotus was correct. Surely Herodotus’ calling Tartessus a “trading town” illuminates the Scriptural record. In their Greek-English Lexicon, the learned Liddle & Scott readily identify Ταρτησσoς as “the Tarshish of Scripture.”

The last Japhethite tribe to discuss is Tiras, or in Strong’s Hebrew spelling, Thiyrac. Although we have no recorded sources for a connection, many modern writers have made perfect etymological sense in presenting Thrace as the habitation of these people.

Modern anthropologists, archaeologists and historians often discuss the “sea peoples” whom they usually claim were Caucasians who came from the Aegean area and invaded the Mediterranean. The true origin of these “sea peoples” are as the Japhethites of Genesis 10, who were spread along the waterways from the Caspian and Black Seas and as far west as Spain, and at a very early time. Contrast Genesis 10:5 with 10:20 and 10:31, where the Japhethites are specifically assigned the “isles” or “coast lands,” but not the Hamites or Shemites.

Genesis 10:6-14

Genesis 10:6‑14

6: And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan.

7: And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sabtecha: and the sons of Raamah; Sheba, and Dedan.

8: And Cush begat Nimrod: he began to be a mighty one in the earth.

9: He was a mighty hunter before the LORD: wherefore it is said, Even as Nimrod the mighty hunter before the LORD.